Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

Evaluating Regression Models in JASP

Hello everyone,
I have a question regarding this passage from 'Bayesian Inferences for Psychology Part II' (p. 20):
'All models (except perhaps for Pitch) receive over- whelming evidence in comparison to the Null model. The model that outperforms the Null model the most is the two main effects model, Gender + Pitch. Adding the interaction makes the model less competitive. The evidence against including the interaction is roughly a factor of ten. This can be obtained as 8.192e+39 / 8.864e+38 ≈ 9.24. Thus, the data are 9.24 times more likely under the two main effects model than under the model that adds the interaction.'

My table from JASP looks like this (I hope the attached screen shot works). How do I use the above technique here? Do I always just choose the model with the larger BF10 and divide it by the smaller BF10 to find out which main effect makes the model less competitive?

My attempt at writing this up currently looks like that:
"Table 11 shows that the model which was most strongly supported was the one with the main effects of Calm + Friendliest (BF10=58.37). For this model, there was evidence against the inclusion of Calm (BF=9.11) but not against the inclusion of Friendliest (BF=1.80) which suggests Friendliest was the more important predictor of Winter Again. The Calm + Friendliest + Leadership model is also strongly supported (BF10=54.97) and there was no evidence against the inclusion of Leadership (BF=1.04). Additionally, there was strong support for the model combining all four aspects: Calm + Friendliest + Closest Friend + Leadership (BF10=16.06). So, There was moderate evidence against including Friendliest in this model."

Comments

  • The file with the screenshot I wanted to upload has repeatedly failed to upload...I hope this link works!
    https://ibb.co/b4juVk

  • Hi Eniseg2,

    The next version of JASP will have the option to put the best model on top as a comparison model, which will make all of this easier. With respect to your text, my comments inline:

    "Table 11 shows that the model which was most strongly supported was the one with the main effects of Calm + Friendliest [EJ: FriendliestMostPupular, I assume ] (BF10=58.37) [EJ: this is against the model without any predictors]. For this model, there was evidence against the inclusion of Calm (BF=9.11) [EJ: You might want to clarify which models you are comparing here -- also, there can't be evidence against the inclusion of Calm if Calm + Friendliest is the best model] but not against the inclusion of Friendliest (BF=1.80) which suggests Friendliest was the more important predictor of Winter Again. The Calm + Friendliest + Leadership model is also strongly supported (BF10=54.97) [EJ: but again, this is compared to the null model without any predictors] and there was no evidence against the inclusion of Leadership (BF=1.04). Additionally, there was strong support for the model combining all four aspects: Calm + Friendliest + Closest Friend + Leadership (BF10=16.06). So, There was moderate evidence against including Friendliest in this model."

    I think what you want to look at is the analysis of effects, the table that computes inclusion probabilities by averaging across all of these models. Your example is linear regression, I assume.

    Cheers,
    E.J.

Sign In or Register to comment.

agen judi bola , sportbook, casino, togel, number game, singapore, tangkas, basket, slot, poker, dominoqq, agen bola. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 50.000 ,- bonus cashback hingga 10% , diskon togel hingga 66% bisa bermain di android dan IOS kapanpun dan dimana pun. poker , bandarq , aduq, domino qq , dominobet. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 10.000 ,- bonus turnover 0.5% dan bonus referral 20%. Bonus - bonus yang dihadirkan bisa terbilang cukup tinggi dan memuaskan, anda hanya perlu memasang pada situs yang memberikan bursa pasaran terbaik yaitu http://45.77.173.118/ Bola168. Situs penyedia segala jenis permainan poker online kini semakin banyak ditemukan di Internet, salah satunya TahunQQ merupakan situs Agen Judi Domino66 Dan BandarQ Terpercaya yang mampu memberikan banyak provit bagi bettornya. Permainan Yang Di Sediakan Dewi365 Juga sangat banyak Dan menarik dan Peluang untuk memenangkan Taruhan Judi online ini juga sangat mudah . Mainkan Segera Taruhan Sportbook anda bersama Agen Judi Bola Bersama Dewi365 Kemenangan Anda Berapa pun akan Terbayarkan. Tersedia 9 macam permainan seru yang bisa kamu mainkan hanya di dalam 1 ID saja. Permainan seru yang tersedia seperti Poker, Domino QQ Dan juga BandarQ Online. Semuanya tersedia lengkap hanya di ABGQQ. Situs ABGQQ sangat mudah dimenangkan, kamu juga akan mendapatkan mega bonus dan setiap pemain berhak mendapatkan cashback mingguan. ABGQQ juga telah diakui sebagai Bandar Domino Online yang menjamin sistem FAIR PLAY disetiap permainan yang bisa dimainkan dengan deposit minimal hanya Rp.25.000. DEWI365 adalah Bandar Judi Bola Terpercaya & resmi dan terpercaya di indonesia. Situs judi bola ini menyediakan fasilitas bagi anda untuk dapat bermain memainkan permainan judi bola. Didalam situs ini memiliki berbagai permainan taruhan bola terlengkap seperti Sbobet, yang membuat DEWI365 menjadi situs judi bola terbaik dan terpercaya di Indonesia. Tentunya sebagai situs yang bertugas sebagai Bandar Poker Online pastinya akan berusaha untuk menjaga semua informasi dan keamanan yang terdapat di POKERQQ13. Kotakqq adalah situs Judi Poker Online Terpercayayang menyediakan 9 jenis permainan sakong online, dominoqq, domino99, bandarq, bandar ceme, aduq, poker online, bandar poker, balak66, perang baccarat, dan capsa susun. Dengan minimal deposit withdraw 15.000 Anda sudah bisa memainkan semua permaina pkv games di situs kami. Jackpot besar,Win rate tinggi, Fair play, PKV Games