- Last Active
Thank you. I am downloading he paper now. But meanwhile, I conclude my other interpretation is correct: "a model including the interaction term is more strongly supported than one without it." Yes? (I am BoomChicago dad.)
Is the result of Francesco's division (BF10 = 33) strong evidence of a pure interaction effect? It seems to me to state only that a model including the interaction term is more strongly supported than one without it.