Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

Bayesian t-tests, computing M0 and M1

Dear Bayes factor experts,

Bayesian t-tests in JASP are done following Rouder et al. (2011). For my current purpose I need the separate values of the nominator and denominator of their equation 1:

B01 = (1 + t^2/v)^-(v+1)/2 / ∫ 0- ∞ (1 + Ng)^-1/2(1 + t^2/(1 + Ng)v)^-(v+1)/2 (2 π )^-1/2 g^-3/2 e ^-1/(2g) dg

So, separately the values of the bold and normal parts of their equation, in other words the values of the marginal likelihoods M0 and M1 (if I understood correctly) with only the t-statistic and N available.

Is there any way - either using JASP or e.g. R - to get these values?

Any help is highly appreciated.

ref: Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic bulletin & review16(2), 225-237.

Comments

  • Hi roundcircle,

    Well, you have B01 (from R or JASP), and you can easily compute the numerator, so that then determines the denominator. However, (I have not checked this) I'd be surprised if that equation shows the two marginal likelihoods -- I suspect that common terms will have canceled. An in-depth treatment is available here: http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2016/LyEtAl2016JMP.pdf (see Eq 10c, that includes additional terms).

    Cheers,

    E.J.

  • Dear EJ,

    Thank you for pointing this out! In the meantime I have found a Matlab package that incorporated the formula in one of its functions:

    Indeed I could have done it your way, but I was using these terms to show how B01 reacts to changes in t-statistic or N factor. Taking the B01 to compute the denominator would make my argument kind of circular. If any useful literature comes to mind regarding this subject, please post!

Sign In or Register to comment.