agen judi bola , sportbook, casino, togel, number game, singapore, tangkas, basket, slot, poker, dominoqq,
agen bola. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 50.000 ,- bonus cashback hingga 10% , diskon togel hingga 66% bisa bermain di android dan IOS kapanpun dan dimana pun. poker , bandarq , aduq, domino qq ,
dominobet. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 10.000 ,- bonus turnover 0.5% dan bonus referral 20%. Bonus - bonus yang dihadirkan bisa terbilang cukup tinggi dan memuaskan, anda hanya perlu memasang pada situs yang memberikan bursa pasaran terbaik yaitu
http://45.77.173.118/ Bola168. Situs penyedia segala jenis permainan poker online kini semakin banyak ditemukan di Internet, salah satunya TahunQQ merupakan situs Agen Judi Domino66 Dan
BandarQ Terpercaya yang mampu memberikan banyak provit bagi bettornya. Permainan Yang Di Sediakan Dewi365 Juga sangat banyak Dan menarik dan Peluang untuk memenangkan Taruhan Judi online ini juga sangat mudah . Mainkan Segera Taruhan Sportbook anda bersama
Agen Judi Bola Bersama Dewi365 Kemenangan Anda Berapa pun akan Terbayarkan. Tersedia 9 macam permainan seru yang bisa kamu mainkan hanya di dalam 1 ID saja. Permainan seru yang tersedia seperti Poker, Domino QQ Dan juga
BandarQ Online. Semuanya tersedia lengkap hanya di ABGQQ. Situs ABGQQ sangat mudah dimenangkan, kamu juga akan mendapatkan mega bonus dan setiap pemain berhak mendapatkan cashback mingguan. ABGQQ juga telah diakui sebagai
Bandar Domino Online yang menjamin sistem FAIR PLAY disetiap permainan yang bisa dimainkan dengan deposit minimal hanya Rp.25.000. DEWI365 adalah
Bandar Judi Bola Terpercaya & resmi dan terpercaya di indonesia. Situs judi bola ini menyediakan fasilitas bagi anda untuk dapat bermain memainkan permainan judi bola. Didalam situs ini memiliki berbagai permainan taruhan bola terlengkap seperti Sbobet, yang membuat DEWI365 menjadi situs judi bola terbaik dan terpercaya di Indonesia. Tentunya sebagai situs yang bertugas sebagai
Bandar Poker Online pastinya akan berusaha untuk menjaga semua informasi dan keamanan yang terdapat di POKERQQ13. Kotakqq adalah situs
Judi Poker Online Terpercayayang menyediakan 9 jenis permainan sakong online, dominoqq, domino99, bandarq, bandar ceme, aduq, poker online, bandar poker, balak66, perang baccarat, dan capsa susun. Dengan minimal deposit withdraw 15.000 Anda sudah bisa memainkan semua permaina pkv games di situs kami. Jackpot besar,Win rate tinggi, Fair play, PKV Games
Comments
Could there be assumption-violations? It's difficult to tell what might be going on without seeing the actual data.
R
Yes the data would be good, but screenshots of the relevant tables would be good too. Did you use a recent version of JASP? We updated the model specification a year ago, see for instance https://jasp-stats.org/2022/07/29/bayesian-repeated-measures-anova-an-updated-methodology-implemented-in-jasp/
I did use the recent version of JASP and the specifications in the 2022 paper. I also included the comparison of only matched models that Sebastian suggested as specified in the paper of 2020. Based on the Q-Q plots I believe there was not an assumption that has been violated (correct me if I am wrong).
This is the analysis of the effects:
Post hoc
Q-Q plots:
Am I missing something important? Please let me know, and thank you so much for your quick replies.
Best,
María
Could there be any rows with missing data that are excluded from the ANOVA but (incorrectly) included in the post hoc test?
R
There are not missing values in the data, from what I checked just now. As far as I know, it is not possible to check or correct some assumptions (like non-sphericity) in the Bayesian ANOVA features in JASP as it is now. Maybe there will lie the issue? What other option may have caused this?
I wonder, what is the result of a frequentist repeated measures ANOVA on the same data? Does it still produce an incongruence between main effect and post hoc?
R
Do you have a raincloud plot of the data, showing the effect?
This is the rain cloud plots of ROI.
And regarding the frequentists ANOVA: with corrections for not met assumptions:
The frequentist says it is not significant
This is a little puzzling, because the uncorrected BF ought to be just a t-test BF, and that particular t-value would not give such a huge BF (but something anecdotal in favor of H0). I've asked the team.
Thank you so much for your time and caution in this matter! I will be looking forward to your response.
Best wishes,
María
So suppose you take all of the "visual" data points, and compare it to all of the "motor" data points, collapsing across all other factors -- for that t-test, what is t and n?
I did it like you mentioned:
For the frequentist analysis I got a significant p-value and for the BF I got a similar one to the post-hoc test value.
The n is 152.
Ah, so this is t=-4.747, and that matches with the BF10. So the problem, it seems, is that in our Bayesian post-hoc test we average across all the other factors and levels, and this is not what the frequentist test does. I'll see whether the team has something to add.
Alright. Once again, thank you so much for your prompt responses! :)