Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

95% CI Outputs Reported Backwards?

Hello,

I hope it's ok to post potentially basic questions here.

I am a psychology student who has been using JASP for my thesis analyses. My variable scores have been output in JASP with the 95% Confidence Intervals reported backwards (i.e. lower level CIs are higher than upper level CIs) - see screenshot.

Is this a system bug? Or if not, how do I rectify this?

Many thanks in advance,

Katie


Comments

  • Katie,

    They look fine to me - your upper CIs are higher numbers than your lower CIs, at least as far as I can tell. The only point of confusion I can see is that the upper CI is reported before the lower CI, which is unusual (at least for us USA guys). Am I missing something?

  • I agree the order is strange, and we ought to fix that.

  • (and I have made an issue on our internal JASP issue tracker, thanks for reporting this!)

Sign In or Register to comment.