Bayesian test assumptions

Comments

• EJ

  September 2016

  Yes and yes. Also, we are working to include nonparametric Bayesian tests.

  Cheers,
  E.J.
• AMa

  September 2016

  Thanks for your reply E.J., that sounds like an awesome addition to your program (I really like using it already). Just to clarify: So you mean to say that Bayesian analysis is more robust than the frequentist counterpart? Could you (or anyone else) point me to a publication that demonstrates this for the analyses used in JASP? Thank you!
• EJ

  September 2016

  Oh, no, the degree of robustness has not been verified. But both classical and Bayesian tests rely on the same basic features of the data, so it stands to reason that they will be similarly affected.
  Cheers,
  E.J.
• nicolas

  July 2017

  E.J., in the meantime, what would be my options if my data violates both assumptions?

  Any time-frame for those non-parametric Bayesian tests?

  Thanks!
• EJ

  July 2017

  Well the tests are ready, we need to finish up the paper and include them. It is a big of work, but when we have the paper submitted you are welcome to the code so you could run it before it's implemented in JASP