EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,023
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Hi Mila, I think this topic is understudied. Pragmatically, I might suggest either doubling or halving the default setting... Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Paolo85, Feature requests can be issued through our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) where it would be best to be as specific as possible -- JASP calls 475 R packages :-) Cheers, E.J.
-
Dear JamieB, Hmm I don't think this is possible now, but it would be an interesting feature request for our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Cheers, E.J.
-
I've attended our expert to your post! EJ
-
Hi jaspuser23, The primary Bayesian correction for multiplicity is in the prior model probability (see for instance https://psyarxiv.com/s56mk). If the tests are not independent that does complicate matters, and in general it is always best to accou…
-
This was addressed on GitHub, I believe? I saw Bruno respond....
-
¡Hola! ¿Has visto los archivos de ayuda? (puedes hacer clic en los círculos azules con el signo de exclamación) ¿Puedes indicar exactamente dónde está la funcionalidad de interés? (¡tenemos mucho!)
-
Hi Laura, Sorry about the delay. I've forwarded this to our expert. I will note that the "Order Restricted Hypotheses" is something you might want to check out. Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Prisca, I am not sure what the best way is to correct z-scores for age, but I am sure you are not the first one to confront this problem (so I would look online and in the literature to see what the experts recommend). And for the clusters, my st…
-
Why do you consider these results to be different? Both methods indicate support for the full model over the null model (and any other model, in fact). Note that the principle of marginality dictates that if the interaction is part of the model, so …
-
Hi Berenike, We have seen this issue a few times. This is really something for our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/). I will ask the team whether this issue has been resolved. Cheers, E.…
-
This just looks like a bug. If you enter the variables individually you should see different results. I will try to see if I can reproduce this...no, it works fine for me, I get different results. Please post the issue on our GitHub page, and outlin…
-
Ah. Well I think your best bet is to contact the programmers by posting the issue on our GitHub page! Cheers, E.J.
-
This may be relevant: https://forum.cogsci.nl/discussion/8920/please-help-failed-to-open-a-file-in-jasp#latest
-
We're eager to solve this, but this is an issue for our GitHub page, where you'll be in direct contact with our programming team (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/). I'll attend them to the Forum post…
-
Answered at https://forum.cogsci.nl/discussion/8879/opposite-results-for-contingency-table-one-sided-with-ordinal-data#latest
-
Hi Mirjam, I prefer to use the Bayesian A/B test in this case (see for instance https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.9278). This is a comparison of two proportions. I suspect it has labeled your "failures" as successes. If you e…
-
Hmm it seems to me that you would be much better off recoding those zeros as NAs. Presently you cannot define missing values on a column-by-column basis. It might be a reasonable feature request for our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stat…
-
Hi Hunter, The BF of 6 is for full model against the *null* model. If your interest is specifically in the group factor, you would do best to consider all models that include the group factor and compare them against all models without that factor. …
-
I've asked our expert, sorry about the delay E.J.
-
That looks more like a bug, strange. I'll bring this to the attention of your expert. EJ
-
I am not sure exactly what you wish to do, but JASP has, for instance, the functionality to test all sorts of order-restrictions (for the R package see https://restriktor.org/tutorial/syntax.html) E.J.
-
Hi Jas, I'll bring you in contact with the relevant team member. It would help if you had a few concrete examples to work with. Cheers, E.J.
-
In the spreadsheet view, you can also shorten the labels of your columns, if that makes the graphs look better. Or you can export them as pdf or pptx and use a different font size :-) EJ
-
I've asked the team
-
It seems to me that the Shapiro-Wilk test that we use is for multivariate normality; in the case of a simple correlation between X and Y, we would test bivariate normality -- but not the normality of each variable separately (this would also return …
-
I am not sure (you would think so), but in JASP you can get the standard error of the mean from, say, Descriptives and several other analyses as well (T-test etc) EJ
-
Update: I do spot some mismatch between the tables and the figures when I set both intervals to 95%. I believe (because it is descriptives) that the intervals ought to be the same as the frequentist ones. So it is strange to see a difference. I'll a…
-
I am confused now! I will tag some team members, but I was wondering what the issue was. Clearly the intervals will be different when one is a 75% interval and the other a 95% interval. Is the issue that the plot is nevertheless consistent with the …
-
There is some guidance here: https://jasp-stats.org/2020/04/23/jags-meets-jasp/ Some of this was done in JASP as well: https://www.bayesianspectacles.org/order-restrictions-in-jags-five-methods-fail-one-method-succeeds/ It is basically just writing …