Bayesian rmANOVA Model Comparison and Post-hoc tests deviate
I ran a Baysian rmANOVA with a factor time and a factor conditions. I am unsure how to interpret these results though. There seems to be string evidence for the main effect of time compared to the null model. But when I look at the post-hoc tests there doesnt seem to be evidence for an effect of time. This is consistent with the descriptive plot:
I was first thinking that it may be because the main effect of time collapses all conditions but they do not seem to be very different even then.
Can anyone help me interpret this output?
Thank you for your help!