Interpretation of RM ANOVA output -> two models are supported
a two-way RM ANOVA with the BF package gave the following output:
If I interpret it correctly, there is anecdotal support for the model with the factor point of measurement and anectodal support for the model with both factors and interaction. What do I do with this? of course, there is not much evidence of an effect. but what do I report? that there is a small effect of point of measurement but at the same time of an interaction with group?
if I look at the ratio of both BFs, 2.01/2.64 = 0.761, there is more support to no difference between the models. Is this correct?