Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

RM ANOVA

Dear all,

the results table gets all mixed up (I assume...) when conducting a Bayesian RM ANOVA.

For one of my datasets it looks like this (how it is supposed to look - I think - with

1. null model, 2. main effect A, 3. main effect B, 4. main effect A + B, 5. main effect A + B + A*B)

However, on another dataset, the column "models" gets all jumbled up and appears in a different order (2/4/5/1/3).

Is this some bug and is JUST the first column mixed up and it is safe to assume that all the reported data columns are still in the "correct" order? Or is this some statistical feature that I do not understand properly..?

Thanks for any clarification upfront.

Tina

Comments

  • Hey Tina,

    You compare all models with the null model in the first table, and you compare with the best model in the second table, that`s why the order is different. Check the order:


    Aytac

  • you are absolutely right. thanks!

Sign In or Register to comment.