Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

Calculating Delta for Post Hoc Test

Hello!

Does anyone know if there is a way to calculate Delta for a post hoc test following a Baysian ANCOVA?

Thanks! ☺️

Comments

  • The effect size estimate under H1 would remain the same, as would the Bayes factor. The post-hoc character of the test affects only the prior model odds. Now if you wanted to obtain a model-averaged estimate of effect size using both H0 and H1, then that estimate would change (and be shrunk more to 0, because H0 now has a bigger weight). See also https://psyarxiv.com/h6pr8/

    Cheers,

    E.J.

  • Thanks, that ref is really interesting perhaps a little bit over my head haha!

    so you know when you run a Bayesian independent samples t-test in JASP you get a delta value, what I was hoping for is a way to achieve the same thing, but in the context of a post hoc pairwise comparison following a Bayesian ANCOVA. Is this possible?


    Thanks so much!

    Agnes

  • Hmm I am not 100% sure what you would like. I assume that with "delta value" you mean the posterior point estimate of effect size? If so, see my earlier response. If not, could you clarify?

    Cheers,

    E.J.

Sign In or Register to comment.