log(BF10) vs. BF10?
I am trying to calculate the fit of data across H0 and H1 using a independent samples t-test. Here's the output:
May I know what is the raw value for the BF10? Given the extremely large BF10, should I report the log(BF10) instead? If so, how should I report and interpret the BF according to Jeffrey's guidelines?
I am trying to describe the results in this format: "A two-sided analysis revealed a Bayes factor (BF10) that the data were 442346 times more likely under the alternative than the null hypothesis."