Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

Conducting Orthogonal Planned Contrasts within Bayesian ANCOVA in JASP/Bayes Factor

Hi All,

I have a 2 (Variable 1: Choice: Choice and No Choice) x3 (Variable 2: Social modelling: Consistent, Inconsistent and control) between subjects design within an ANCOVA containing one categorical covariate(Gender: Male, Female). I have successfully been able to conduct my Bayesian ANCOVA in JASP and R by dummy coding my covariate.

However, now i would like to get bayes factors for each of my orthogonal contrasts (2 main effects of social modelling, 2 interaction effects between social modelling and choice).

I have tried to contrast code my two variables (Choice and Social Modelling) into 4 variables representing each orthogonal contrast and force them in to the analysis as covariates (Along with gender - dummy coded and choice contrast coded). As a proof of concept i did this within a traditional ANOVA in JASP and the contrast coded 4 orthogonal contrasts did give correct P values.

However, when replicate this process within the bayesian ANCOVA, It does not appear to work (checked by contrasting the BF of the Choice variable compared to the null when entered as a fixed factor in my original bayesian ANCOVA and the BF of the choice variable compared to the null when entered as a contrast coded covariate along with all other variables contrast coded)

I would appreciate anyone that could shed light on why the Bayesian analysis differs from the traditional ANCOVA. Specifically why categorical variables are giving different results when contrast/dummy coded and entered as covariates rather than fixed factors. Is this due to a difference in default priors for fixed factors vs covariates?

Alternatively, if anyone could propose an alternative method though which i could get a BF for an orthogonal contrasts (main and interaction) to report alongside my traditional frequentist statistics.

Thanks

Comments

  • This is a tricky question. I'll ask Richard and Don to help out.

    Cheers,

    E.J.

  • I'm not 100% sure I understand why the "bayesian ANCOVA does not appear to work", a JASP file (or R script) would be very helpful for me to fully understand what you're trying to do. Nevertheless, concerning

    Specifically why categorical variables are giving different results when contrast/dummy coded and entered as covariates rather than fixed factors. Is this due to a difference in default priors for fixed factors vs covariates?

    That's could definitely be a reason. In JASP, under additional options we have

    So the scale of the Cauchy prior is different for variables entered in the box "Fixed Factors" than for dummy coded variables entered in the box "Covariates". If you want to obtain the same results, you should set the "r scale fixed effects" to the same value as "r scale covariates".

  • Hi Don,

    Thanks so much for the response. I have tried changing priors and it does not seem to make a difference.


    Here is Data, Output and data dictionary:

    (sorry it won't let me upload the JASP file so i have given you my csv and results, if you give me an email i can send you the JASP file)

    The issue is when choice (or any categorical variable) is entered dummy coded, the BF01 changes.


    e.g. BF choice (category, fixed factor) = 0.310, error 1.4%

    BF choice contrast coded, covariate = 0.446, error = 0.01%


    Really appreciate your help on this one!

    Regards,

    Cosette

  • The priors for continuous covariates are different in more than just the scaling: when you enter variable as a continuous covariates, the prior depends on the covariance matrix. When the variables are truly categorical, the covariance matrix is essentially just contains information about group Ns (This is why we developed Bayesian ANOVA). Additionally, with continuous covariates all covariates are linked via a common g parameter, while this is not the case for categorical variables.

    So there are a lot of reasons why the results would be different.

    The way to handle this is by recoding the categorical variables. I discuss this a bit on my blog in a simple example (what you can do with recoding: https://bayesfactor.blogspot.com/2015/01/multiple-comparisons-with-bayesfactor-1.html), you'd have to tailor it to your own (somewhat more complicated) needs.

    Best, Richard

  • edited July 31

    Thank you Richard for the answer - that clarifies a lot.

    I was wondering if you could shed further light on the recoding of the variables. The first contrast (-0.5,-0.5,1) is relatively simple to generate using the guide you linked, however my second contrast compares 2 of three groups specifically (a contrast of -1,1,0 for groups 1 2 and 3 respectively), meaning that when i code the group not of interest as an NA value Jasp/R cannot handle it.

    Are there another resources you could suggest, or methods to attempt to recode my 3 level categorical variable into that second 'pairwise' contrast? (preferably in a way that generates the respective interaction as well :) )

Sign In or Register to comment.

agen judi bola , sportbook, casino, togel, number game, singapore, tangkas, basket, slot, poker, dominoqq, agen bola. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 50.000 ,- bonus cashback hingga 10% , diskon togel hingga 66% bisa bermain di android dan IOS kapanpun dan dimana pun. poker , bandarq , aduq, domino qq , dominobet. Semua permainan bisa dimainkan hanya dengan 1 ID. minimal deposit 10.000 ,- bonus turnover 0.5% dan bonus referral 20%. Bonus - bonus yang dihadirkan bisa terbilang cukup tinggi dan memuaskan, anda hanya perlu memasang pada situs yang memberikan bursa pasaran terbaik yaitu http://45.77.173.118/ Bola168. Situs penyedia segala jenis permainan poker online kini semakin banyak ditemukan di Internet, salah satunya TahunQQ merupakan situs Agen Judi Domino66 Dan BandarQ Terpercaya yang mampu memberikan banyak provit bagi bettornya. Permainan Yang Di Sediakan Dewi365 Juga sangat banyak Dan menarik dan Peluang untuk memenangkan Taruhan Judi online ini juga sangat mudah . Mainkan Segera Taruhan Sportbook anda bersama Agen Judi Bola Bersama Dewi365 Kemenangan Anda Berapa pun akan Terbayarkan. Tersedia 9 macam permainan seru yang bisa kamu mainkan hanya di dalam 1 ID saja. Permainan seru yang tersedia seperti Poker, Domino QQ Dan juga BandarQ Online. Semuanya tersedia lengkap hanya di ABGQQ. Situs ABGQQ sangat mudah dimenangkan, kamu juga akan mendapatkan mega bonus dan setiap pemain berhak mendapatkan cashback mingguan. ABGQQ juga telah diakui sebagai Bandar Domino Online yang menjamin sistem FAIR PLAY disetiap permainan yang bisa dimainkan dengan deposit minimal hanya Rp.25.000. DEWI365 adalah Bandar Judi Bola Terpercaya & resmi dan terpercaya di indonesia. Situs judi bola ini menyediakan fasilitas bagi anda untuk dapat bermain memainkan permainan judi bola. Didalam situs ini memiliki berbagai permainan taruhan bola terlengkap seperti Sbobet, yang membuat DEWI365 menjadi situs judi bola terbaik dan terpercaya di Indonesia. Tentunya sebagai situs yang bertugas sebagai Bandar Poker Online pastinya akan berusaha untuk menjaga semua informasi dan keamanan yang terdapat di POKERQQ13. Kotakqq adalah situs Judi Poker Online Terpercayayang menyediakan 9 jenis permainan sakong online, dominoqq, domino99, bandarq, bandar ceme, aduq, poker online, bandar poker, balak66, perang baccarat, dan capsa susun. Dengan minimal deposit withdraw 15.000 Anda sudah bisa memainkan semua permaina pkv games di situs kami. Jackpot besar,Win rate tinggi, Fair play, PKV Games