A question about the model comparison of bayesian repeated ANOVA using JASP
Hello! I have a question about the model comparsion results of bayesian repeated ANOVA.
Let's say that the model I am interested in is the gender+pitch+interaction mode. The BF10 of my interested model is way larger than the null model(1 vs. 8.864X10^38) but it is smaller than the best model (8.864X10^38 vs. 8.192x10^39). Can I say that my interested model is also supported by the data? If I mention that, how do I explain the effect of the best model in my paper? If I can't say that, is that means the best model in bayesian results is the only model that is supported by the data? Thank you for answearing my question!
Comments
I've addressed this in a different thread: basically, the data do not provide evidence for the full model over and above the two-main effects model. You can see this better when you select "compare to best model" or add the main effects to the null model as nuisances (under the "model" tab)
Cheers,
E.J.
Thank you E.J.!