Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

ICCs vs. rmANOVA

Dear Jasp beople,

I conducted an ICC for a test-retest reliability study. However, when I analyse the same data with a Bayesian rmANOVA the results indicate the opposite. Do you have an idea what could have caused that. The only assumption I have is that this is due to some of the levels not showing normally distributed data. Is that enough to cause such high differences in effects? Or are there other explanations.

See screenshots below:


Comments

  • Repeated-measures ANOVA assesses whether there are significant differences among means (with the variation. Doesn't intraclass correlation address a very different question?

    R

Sign In or Register to comment.