95% Credible Intervals not consistent between descriptive and plot
I have performed a Bayesian RM ANOVA in the new version of JASP (0.18.1) and would like to obtain the exact value of the 95% credibility interval.
On requesting the table, I noticed that the descriptive table of 95% credible intervals did not match the values in the associated descriptive graphs below (see screenshot).
Is this a bug for these values or are these "credible intervals" quite different? If so, how are they calculated, and from which R packages? Also, what is/should be the correct credible interval (table or graph)?
Thanks for your help and answers, it's always very instructive to get your feedback!
Johan A. ACHARD
PhD Student in Cognitive Sciences