reporting JASP results
Hi all!
As I have spent quite some time on browsing the forum for examples of reporting JASP output, I thought maybe a new discussion here would be nice.
First question: I really like the baws factor idea, but what should I call it in a paper? I rather like "baws", but I haven't read Sebastiaan contradicting EJW on that it may not have been a serieus term suggestion 
Has anyone used it in reporting before? What did you call it? thanks!
Comments
Well, my first suggestion would obviously be to refer to it as the Baws Factor so that, despite @EJ's hesitation, this becomes the de facto name ;-)
But I believe that JASP will call it the "Inclusion Bayes Factor across matched models", right @EJ?
Check out SigmundAI.eu for our OpenSesame AI assistant!
"Inclusion Bayes Factor across matched models", that would add to my word count
The next JASP version will present to options for "Analysis of Effects", namely "across all models" and "across matched models" -- the second one is Baws ;-)
awesome, thank you both!
Another reporting-related question: When asking JASP to copy citations for a Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA, it gives 3: Jasp team (2017), Morey & Rouder (2015) and Rouder et al (2012).
When clicking "help" in the upper right corner, I get 4, with 1 overlapping: Rouder et al (2015), Rouder et al (2012), Rouder et al (in press) and Wetzels, Grasman & Wagenmakers (2012). Who should I cite when using this analysis, apart from the obvious Jasp team (2017)?
Rouder et al., 2015 (the JMP paper) is the key reference on Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA.