EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,530
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
I am not sure exactly what you wish to do, but JASP has, for instance, the functionality to test all sorts of order-restrictions (for the R package see https://restriktor.org/tutorial/syntax.html) E.J.
-
Hi Jas, I'll bring you in contact with the relevant team member. It would help if you had a few concrete examples to work with. Cheers, E.J.
-
In the spreadsheet view, you can also shorten the labels of your columns, if that makes the graphs look better. Or you can export them as pdf or pptx and use a different font size :-) EJ
-
I've asked the team
-
It seems to me that the Shapiro-Wilk test that we use is for multivariate normality; in the case of a simple correlation between X and Y, we would test bivariate normality -- but not the normality of each variable separately (this would also return …
-
I am not sure (you would think so), but in JASP you can get the standard error of the mean from, say, Descriptives and several other analyses as well (T-test etc) EJ
-
Update: I do spot some mismatch between the tables and the figures when I set both intervals to 95%. I believe (because it is descriptives) that the intervals ought to be the same as the frequentist ones. So it is strange to see a difference. I'll a…
-
I am confused now! I will tag some team members, but I was wondering what the issue was. Clearly the intervals will be different when one is a 75% interval and the other a 95% interval. Is the issue that the plot is nevertheless consistent with the …
-
There is some guidance here: https://jasp-stats.org/2020/04/23/jags-meets-jasp/ Some of this was done in JASP as well: https://www.bayesianspectacles.org/order-restrictions-in-jags-five-methods-fail-one-method-succeeds/ It is basically just writing …
-
Dear Assaf, What an interesting pattern. It appears that the evidence just remains weak...I haven't seen this as beautifully illustrated before. Please let me know if you publish these data anywhere, they would make for a nice demonstration. But as …
-
If you go file -> open inside JASP, you should be able to open .sav files. If it does not work, please open an issue on our GitHub page to let the programmers know. Cheers, E.J.
-
This was temporary glitch on the website, it should be fixed now...can you try again? Cheers, EJ
-
Dear FrankSon, It is often not straightforward to obtain the marginal likelihood from JAGS code. When the models are nested, you could use the Savage-Dickey density ratio (e.g., http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2010/WagenmakersEtAlCogPsy2010.pdf). There…
-
Dear Herve, That must be annoying. To fix the issue (and we really want to fix issues such as these), the programming team needs a reproducible path and as much information as you can provide (such as screenshots). Also, it would be great if you cou…
-
If you email me the file I can take a look (it only needs to have two rows or something to reproduce the issue). Alternatively, you could post this issue on our GitHub page, where you will be in direct contact with the programming team (for details …
-
This is not an explicit strategy, and moreover, I am not sure this perception is correct. For instance, the Time Series module, the Learn Stats module, the Acceptance Sampling, and the Quality Control modules are all 100% frequentist, and they have …
-
could you email me the .jasp file? EJ
-
Thanks AlejandroG, it looks like this might be very helpful EJ
-
First off, could you zoom out by pressing "control" and "minus" at the same time? (you can zoom back in with "control" and "plus"). If your items still don't show then please send a screenshot of the measureme…
-
Hello Berenike, Could you show a screenshot? Perhaps your variables are deemed nominal, and the indicated new column type is continuous? EJ
-
We have a time series module, but it only allows you to plot a single time series. This would be a good feature request for our GitHub page! EJ
-
That is really strange! We would love to understand why this happens. Is this for the current version, 0.18.1? If so, please post an issue on our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/). This …
-
Dear Roald, This may be a bug that we have already fixed. Please post such reports on out GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) as this will bring you in direct contact with the programming …
-
Another (Bayesian) approach is to use the bain module -- Herbert Hoijtink's methods explicitly take into account a combination of equality and inequality constraints. EJ
-
Also: The discrepancy is not glaring; the BF indicates anecdotal evidence, whereas the p-value is near .03, which is not that compelling The inclusion BF is based on taking all models into account, which is fundamentally different from the frequenti…
-
The mediation code is based on lavaan (so SEM), see the help file. So if you build your mediation model in SEM you should get the same result as when you use the mediation analysis. Under "options" in the mediation analysis there is a tick…
-
I guess if you analyze 10 variables you can check multivariate normality -- or if you have a partial correlation where addition of the nuisance variables gives more than two variables in your analysis. EJ
-
Hi Janet, Could you make an issue on the JASP GitHub page? This will brung you in direct contact with the programmers. For details see "How to Request a Feature or Report a Bug in JASP", https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-re…
-
The posthoc BF01, U yields 2.804*10^-4, so below 1, which means evidence in favor of H1. So BF10,U= 1/ 2.804*10^-4 = 3566.334 in favor of their being a difference. EJ
-
Hmm I am not sure we store the labels in the .csv file. A good question for the JASP GitHub page -- maybe we should also allow saving the data as an Rdata frame for instance. For details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-b…