EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,465
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
We're on it Surely you can install an older version through the zip? But I have already pushed all buttons, we hope to do this quickly
-
Update: problem 2 and problem 1 are the same, right? The p-value ought to be 1 or near 1, but is shown as ",000". We are aware of this and will fix it soon
-
Dear Herve, Thanks for this. We are aware of problem (1) and have a hotfix in the making. I will check out problem (2). Note that for bug reports like these it is preferred to create an issue on our GitHub page (see https://jasp-stats.org/feature-re…
-
The easy transformation between different formats has been on our radar for a long time. The reason why we haven't gotten to it yet is because in order to do this properly, other features needed to be in place. We are nearing completion on those, so…
-
Or is this more like a feature request? Would be good to flag it.
-
What do you mean with "4800 Datasets"? Do you mean 4800 pairs of observations?
-
If we do not have it, it would be a good feature request for our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/)
-
True, the measurement scale classification is incomplete. This was a conscious choice at the time, to keep things simple (and more in line with SPSS, probably). We could possibly change it -- I am not sure whether adding a scale is easy or whether i…
-
And it is a recent change, so that explain the difference. :-) EJ
-
In a continuous distribution, all values are unique, so there is no single value that is the most frequent. The reason why they may appear to be the same is rounding. On the other hand, modes in continuous distributions are well defined. From Wikipe…
-
We did make some changes to the mode calculation recently. When you say: "the correct value of 45", I assume that the value 45 occurs the most? This makes sense if the data is discrete. But if the data is continuous (scale), the exact same…
-
Strange, and clearly an issue for our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/)
-
Do you have a concrete data set or screenshot you could share?
-
Thanks! I will bring this to the attention of Johnny van Doorn, who will be particularly pleased with this helpful feedback!
-
I am not an expert on this analysis, but what I would do: Ask ChatGPT :-) Confirm with the literature it suggests Ask an expert I will forward your question to some experts and see whether there is a general answer
-
I will ask the team, good question.
-
You can do "compute new column" and construct a new variable y as (x-YourMean)/YourSD.
-
Dear Kwellstein, This looks anomalous to me. Could you post it on our GitHub page (https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/) so the team can have a closer look? Please include as much detail as you can -- ideally a data set or zipped JAS…
-
Hi Emma, This is unfortunate! The issue is one for our programming team, however; this forum is for stats questions. You can contact the programming team directly by creating an issue on our GitHub page (https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-r…
-
Hello AnnaPsy, Tarandeep is mostly correct. We do have Bayesian post-hoc tests in ANOVA though, and they follow the Westfall et al idea. You can read more about Bayesian corrections in a thesis of my former student and JASP programmer Tim de Jong: h…
-
So when you select "best model on top" it also helps to select BF01 (or BF10 -- the opposite from what you have now). Then, if you look at the BF10 column, you will see that the best model only has "condition", and the data are …
-
This text makes sense, but the random url makes this spam, unfortunately. Paul, this is an excellent feature request for our GitHub page (https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/) EJ
-
Semi-hotfix 0.95.1 solved the issue
-
Have you posted this issue on the JASP GitHub page? If so, can you provide the url to the issue, so we can follow up there? https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/ EJ
-
This is really strange. This looks like a bug report -- please post the issue on the JASP GitHub page, and include as much detail as you can (see https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/) EJ
-
Also, there was a bug regarding this functionality in 0.95, and this was solved in the hotfix. So please try 0.95.1, if you haven't already! EJ
-
Yes, doubling and halving is a fair strategy. Not sure why BSEM would differ, other than updates in the underlying R package (I will ask Julius to check) EJ
-
Hello JNL, Yes You can check out some of the RM ANOVA examples in the JASP data library, the online data library, or the examples from the Field course book "Discovering Statistics Using JASP" -- see the Teaching menu on the JASP website. …
-
Also, you want to select "best model on top" instead of "null model on top" so that the results are a little easier to interpret. And in general I would say the results concerning the interaction suggest "absence of evidence…
-
Hi Franzis, These technical problems are best dealt with through GitHub, which brings you in direct contact with the programming team (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Your issue has been reported …