HannaG

Comments

• Dear both, Thank you both for your responses. A lot happened last year, and I must have lost track of this thread. But I wanted to give a shout-out to you to thank you for taking the time to answer questions here! Much appreciated and very helpful! …

  in BF between 1 and 3, cannot collect more data, meaningful to report ? Comment by HannaG October 2018
• Thank you! Well then, I will try to convince our reviewer and myself with: "BF summarizes the relative predictive performance of H0 vs H1. As in classic statistics, it is possible to obtain strong evidence in Bayesian statistics even for a smal…

  in medium effect size but very large Bayes factor ? Comment by HannaG October 2018
• Thank you for taking the time to respond, I really appreciate it! The sample size was 'only' 90, so I am not sure if that counts as large and if this explanation holds. The plots also suggest that we got the high predictive performance of H1 already…

  in medium effect size but very large Bayes factor ? Comment by HannaG October 2018
• Thank you also for this answer! (First time using Bayesian analyses and already a fan! Amazing to be able to identify inconclusive data and have a measure of support for the null hypothesis, this might change my analysis strategies quite a bit!)

  in classic and Bayesian t-test results contradict each other Comment by HannaG December 2016
• Thank you very much, Erik-Jan, also for the additional advice. I posted an abbreviated version here on the forum, what I wrote in the actual method section was: "Two-sided Bayesian paired t-tests (with a default Cauchy prior width of r = 0.707)…

  in Interpreting a Bayes Factor that favours the alternative hypothesis Comment by HannaG December 2016