Ivan

Comments

• Hey E.J. Ok, I see. You are right about the .01 if you where referring to the mixed-model analysis. So I will be transparant about the analysis and report all models in a table in the appendix. Thanks for your help. Best, Ivan

  in Discrepancy between frequentist and bayesian ANOVA Comment by Ivan October 2017
• Hi E.J., The BF for including only the Source*MemoryCue interaction is 1.543 if I look in the BF10 column (see above) which compares the model with the interaction against the nuissance model that has both main effects. Or am I looking at the wrong…

  in Discrepancy between frequentist and bayesian ANOVA Comment by Ivan September 2017
• Now analyzed the data using a linear mixed effects model. Again, as I have never used these models before, I am not sure if I did it right: First I fitted a baseline model without the interaction of interest: m0 <- lmer(SourceRecall ~ Group+Mem…

  in Discrepancy between frequentist and bayesian ANOVA Comment by Ivan August 2017
• Thanks for the quick reply. Here is a plot with all the data shown: (Image) I have never conducted a lmer analysis but I will look into it. Best, Ivan

  in Discrepancy between frequentist and bayesian ANOVA Comment by Ivan August 2017
• Hey E.J., Thanks for your quick reply. I reran the analysis using JASP and the same result emerges. The frequentist ANOVA gives a highly sig. interaction between Source and MemoryCue: (Image) But for the bayesian ANOVA there is only "anecd…

  in Discrepancy between frequentist and bayesian ANOVA Comment by Ivan August 2017