MaliAS
About
- Username
- MaliAS
- Joined
- Visits
- 54
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thank you for your reply. The error percentages are lower for some models but higher for some others. I am not sure I understand what you mean by that. According to me, all my 4 factors have to be tested, none of them is "guaranteed" to b…
-
Update: Here is what I get when increasing the numerical accuracy to 100000 (with same seed): Order 1: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/637/A4G9CQFU9AK6.png Order 2: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/032/AN8HDG39CPTI.png I still get large error percent…
-
@EJ Exactly, I tried to rerun the analysis with the same order, and I find varying results too: Run 1: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/911/73V1U2EYTF1V.png Run 2: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/437/PD76084RW1TI.png As said in a previous message, t…
-
WARNING: in my original message, I realized that there was a mistake in the first screenshot I provided (order 1): it was for another run (with a few different values in the datasheet), so here is the correct one: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/828…
-
@vandenman The Laplace approximation was very fast to run, but it says that some BF could not be calculated, so I can not get the BFincl for the effects I am interested in. But still I notice that all the values that I get in the tables are exactly …
-
Hi @vandenman, I did not try these. I will do both and give you an update. Thank you! Best, MaliAS
-
@EJ thank you for your comment. I tried also to put the seed at 1 for all the runs (in these data and some other ones too), but I still get very different results, so it does not solve the issue.
-
@andersony3k Thank you for your comment. I totally agree! That's why I am so concerned about solving this issue.. Of course, I also plan to include the regular rmANOVA in the paper: the p value for the interaction is 0.07. That's why I was hoping th…
-
UPDATE: I checked if the unconsistency of the outputs depending on factors orders was linked to the new versions of JASP (from 0.16.3) which include now random slopes for repeated measures factors. Indeed, when I use the previous versions (or check …
-
Hi Chen, Thank you so much for your answer! I tested what you suggested (setting up the same seed : I put 1), but unfortunately, it didn't attenuate the difference between the 2 results : now it gives the following BFincl: Group*Session: 0.051 (orde…