Markus
About
- Username
- Markus
- Joined
- Visits
- 24
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Great, thank you very much!
-
Great, thank you very much! It worked, but only when I included the interaction effect...
-
Great E.J., thank you very much! I will do that! All the best, Markus
-
Hi E.J., Thank you very much for your time and the response! I put two tables and the model averaged Q-Q plot in the attachment. Best, Markus https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/167/C43IBF6EQY6J.pdf
-
Hi, I have the problem that when I conduct a paired samples t-test my %error is >7.000e-8. My BF is therefore not really valid and should not be interpreted, right? Best, Markus
-
Hi E.J., regarding my post above. When my interaction model has an anecdotal BF10 but my BFInclusion is moderate, which one of these two should I give more weight in my interpretation? Because for me it makes a difference to say the interaction effe…
-
Hi E.J. Thank you very much for your response. I posted my questions a second time because I thought that nobody would recognize it as a separate post. Regarding my problem above, is it allowed to base my interpretation on the BFInclusion score? In…
-
Hi, I have a problem that I can not handle. I found a significant interaction effect (p < .02) based on classical repeated measures ANOVA analysis but I got a insensitive BFinclusion = 1.6 result based on Bayes analysis. Now my biggest problem is…
-
Great, thank you very much E.J.! Best, Markus
-
Hi EJ, thank you very much for your helpful response! Best, Markus
-
PieterHog and EJ: Thank you very much for your great answers. They really helped me a lot! Best, Markus
-
Thank you very much! Markus
-
Thank you very much E.J.! I think I should participate in the workshop. Great work! Cheers, Markus