Avatar

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

Mateus

About

Username
Mateus
Joined
Visits
72
Last Active
Roles
Member

Comments

  • Thanks a lot for everything EJ.
  • Now I understand it! I agree with you EJ. In the previous format, the sentence could be misleading.  I rewrote it. Please let me know what you think.  "Regarding the jump performance, the Bayes factor indicates anecdotal (i.e., weak) evidence t…
  • Hi EJ, Thank you again. Your suggestion is to just mention the first sentence because the evidence is weak. Am I right? Regards, Nuno Mateus
  • Hi EJ, First of all, thank you for your prompt response and amendments. I hope I'm not boring you, but can you please tell me if the next interpretation is also correct? "Using a Bayesian RM ANOVA, the Bayes factor indicates that the data is be…
  • Hi E.J., Now I get it. Thank you for your time, Mateus
  • Of course, my mistake. Correction: the Bayes factor indicates moderate evidence that the distance covered is influenced by the competition period, as the data was 9.43 times more likely to occur under the competition period model (null model: BF10 =…
  • Hi E.J., First of all, thank you for your response. Second, sorry to bother you again with news questions. Can I make the following assumptions: Table 1 - Anecdotal evidence for the null hypothesis in the accelerations variable was observed. Table …
  • Hi Koen, Only now, I notice that last month I forgot to thank you.   I was a good "hacky" solution, as it solved my problem 👌 Thanks again. Mateus
  • https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/179/VWARQME96IV9.png Hi Koen, First of all, I am sorry for my late response. Furthermore, thank you for taking the time to write to give me some feedback. I would like to create a plot representing the distribution of…
  • Looking forward to hearing from you EJ. Thanks.
  • Hi EJ Thank you for your time. Mateus
  • Hi E.J., Thank you for taking the time to write to give me some feedback. One last question. Although, the good evidence for the null model, should I describe the posterior distributions? (e.g., Cluster 3 revealed higher posterior distribution on sl…