PerPalmgren
About
- Username
- PerPalmgren
- Joined
- Visits
- 321
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thanks Don! Question. Is this rectified in JASP 0.17.2? All the best Per
-
@EJ Hi, Do you know if the JASP team has looked into this? I have had some students asking why the Collinearity statistics (VIF & Tolerance) in JASP gets different from when running the same procedure in other programs such SPSS, STATA, Jamovi,…
-
@andersony3k That is a valid point. However, the attached article advice to refrain from pooled error terms in RM designs. https://people.umass.edu/~bogartz/on_pooling_error_terms..html But maybe this article is referring to the omnibus test (have …
-
Did also the post hoc in DATAtab this morning (using default) and got: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/348/X0NW7O6AV6ZM.jpg
-
@JohnnyB Hi, Despite being JASP lover and of the opinion that JASP is the most educative and stringent statisitcal program on the market, I still do not agree with using the "Pool error term for RM factors" as the default for posthoc anal…
-
Hi E.J. That is great👍🏻. But then the predictors in each block are not accounted for? Like for example in a 3-block hierarchical regression in SPSS. Or? Kind regards Per
-
Sure. But one method that can be used to check the assumption of "linearity in the logit" is the Box-Tidwell procedure (Box & Tidwell, 1962). The procedure d can be carried out in various statistical packages, including SPSS Statistics…
-
Hi. Yes I have put up a request with a proposed R package in GitHup. Per
-
Will this be incorporated in the new version of JASP?
-
Consequently the effect size of Kendall´s W for the Friedman´s is different as well.
-
No one 😪
-
@JohnnyB When reading the documentation you provided and the article by Bogartz https://people.umass.edu/~bogartz/on_pooling_error_terms..html provided by @EJ I am not 100% convinced of the option of employing pooled error terms. I think it wou…
-
EJ! BY the way, I saw one thing about your first suggestion. !The frequency table is vital and a must for categorical data. However, I concur about the stem and leaf table.
-
Thank you EJ for your swift reply. Your suggestions seems great😜. Maybe possible to populate the right side more (see screen shot). https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/556/EEZQOA49QQ8I.png Is it possible to locate the tile plots as a sub-drop down me…
-
Great and thank you Johnny🙏😁
-
Is not this reported as Cohen´s D?
-
Hi, I agree with Sameha. I also perceive the 0.15 version is slower than the earlier 0.14.1 🙄. Kind regards Per
-
I have reported this in GitHub now😁! Do you think it will de fixed for the new version in August?
-
Hi, I would like to report a problem. When I run a regression analysis, the coefficient output JASP is producing does NOT seem to recognize the Swedish letter "ö", despite I am using a CSV-UTF8 file (see picture below). This has been fine …
-
No ID-variable😁
-
Great news and I cant wait 😍.
-
😛😍🙏👌😎
-
Aha! I never understood that :-) Thanks E.J.
-
Would be great to do this within JASP :-)
-
Hi, Is there a possibility in JASP to get a measure of effect size when running a non-parametric ANOVA, thus a Kruskal-Wallis test (without having to calculate it manually)?
-
Great😀 and thanks 🙏. I found it. I could change this by going through Text to Columns and delimit it to commas and not semicolon. (see below) https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/625/FUTI43O3ICI9.png All the best Per
-
Thanks 😁 and looking forward to the next version😋