cnhstreet

Comments

• Sorry, to add to that - you've mentioned that the graph is capturing the effect size. I don't think this is partial eta squared because I've seen elsewhere on the forums values that exceed one (I don't remember where sorry). The raw values of this d…

  in Bayesian post-hoc tests for factorial ANOVA Comment by cnhstreet February 2021
• Hi Johnny, Thanks for the reply, I really appreciate it. This is pretty much what I thought: there is no correction implemented yet (admittedly I don't understand enough to know whether that's a statistical or logistical issue). I'm able to interpre…

  in Bayesian post-hoc tests for factorial ANOVA Comment by cnhstreet February 2021
• That's great, thanks so much EJ!

  in Bayes Loglinear Analysis Comment by cnhstreet February 2018
• edit I think the JASP implementation of loglinear analysis is based on Overstall and King's 'conting' [R] package. Is that correct? Are the BFs then based on the posterior model probabilities?

  in Bayes Loglinear Analysis Comment by cnhstreet February 2018
• Hi EJ, Ah I see, thanks so much for such a quick response! That makes me feel a little more comfortable using an informed prior (noting your points made in other threads about small effect sizes). Thanks! Chris

  in Setting Priors in JASP Comment by cnhstreet January 2018
• Hi All, I have a related question. I am reading in quite a few places that the objective/default Cauchy is computationally convenient and gives certain desirable properties for the Bayes factor when the Cauchy scaling is set to 1. JASP uses 1/sqrt(…

  in Setting Priors in JASP Comment by cnhstreet January 2018