gaspar

Comments

• I see, great – thanks so much for the super fast reply!

  in Bayes Factors for non-parametric tests Comment by gaspar June 2020
• Hi Johnny, It's awesome that you shared the R code, but I too have some questions about how to use it. 1. The result is always "BF01" (e.g. regardless of specific xVals or yVal input vectors), i.e. the giveBayesFactorZeroOne output BF <…

  in Bayes Factors for non-parametric tests Comment by gaspar June 2020
• Nope, I wouldn't know how to. I'm still hoping @EJ or @richarddmorey might be able to explain it. (Fortunately this is not so important for me in this present data; this is just an additional and fairly unimportant exploratory analysis in our paper.…

  in Bayes factor (inclusion BF) contradicts p value Comment by gaspar October 2019
• Yes, the probe-irrelevant difference in case of index: t(115) = –3.37, p = .001, d = –0.31, 95% CI [–0.50, –0.13], BF10 = 20.22. Correlation: r(114) = .979, 95% CI [.969, .985], p < .001. Descriptives: M±SD = 80.78±21.25 vs. 82.16±21.37 In case …

  in Bayes factor (inclusion BF) contradicts p value Comment by gaspar October 2019
• @eniseg2: Thanks for the reply, but I'm not comparing against null, it's inclusion Bayes factors, which compares effects taking into account all effects. I'm no expert, but all in all I'm pretty sure it should generally give results that correspond …

  in Bayes factor (inclusion BF) contradicts p value Comment by gaspar September 2019
• Thanks very much for the reply! Yes, my original interpretation was quite wrong, but after a lot of reading I think it's become clear enough. Let me just add that these two posts helped a lot in understanding how it works: https://forum.cogsci.nl/in…

  in BayesFactor anovaBF syntax Comment by gaspar June 2019