metamorphose42
About
- Username
- metamorphose42
- Joined
- Visits
- 3
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
sorry i realized what i was thinking wrong about (or i prefer to blame it on my shingles affected brain). i need to look at BF01 when comparing to the best model, then I know the factor by which any other model is worse. Thanks you again so much fo…
-
I just realized that I'm still on the same question, the best model is not necessary the best model against the null (though it can be also the "best" model against the null). So what defines the best model in the "comparison against …
-
I just realized that I'm still on the same question, the best model is not necessary the best model against the null (though it can be also the "best" model against the null). So what defines the best model in the "comparison against …
-
thanks, i thought this all finally made sense but with another data set, i'm confused again! Here, I have extreme evidence in various models against the null. So I compared to the best model (relevant value), and still all the models are worse only…
-
so if there is no strong evidence for inclusion of any predictors, then the null model is still the better? What I'm confused by is when comparing against the null, and in the last row of the table the model including all terms and interactions com…
-
(Image) of course, thank you! so here i have the BF01 first against the null and with effects analyses incl all models, and then i have BF01 against the best model and effects across matched models. I'm lost when there is neither a strong BF10 n…
-
one more question (sorry!): what if I have an analyses where the 'strongest evidence' is from the BF01=36.8 for the model including all factors and interactions, but nothing else. How does one evaluate interactions? Especially with strong BF01? The…
-
THANK YOU SO MUCH ! ! ! I think I am finally getting somewhere :)
-
Thanks so much, so very helpful!
-
Thanks so much. I will certainly read up on this further, but I already tend towards adjusting the prior. One more question, as I lost a lot of data, from 25 participants to as few as df=9 for some t tests, but still get a very strong BF, but BF is…