mluken

Comments

• I don't think so because all paths are direct and thus the dropdown Process Variable does not apply. Do you have missing data in your variables? You could also check whether the ticked checkboxes under Residual Covariances are the same (under the pa…

  in Different JASP versions giving different results Comment by mluken October 7
• Hi, apologies for the late response. Does your model contain moderators/interactions? After 19.2, interactions are mean-centered by default which was not the case in previous versions. We pinned the version of blavaan to 0.5.2, so it's unlikely that…

  in Different JASP versions giving different results Comment by mluken October 6
• Hi, I second patc3's answers. I want to highlight what is stated in the help file: When using list-wise exclusion, you should only center variables based on complete cases. Otherwise variables are based on differing numbers of cases. This can easily…

  in JASP Process Module Questions: z-Scores and Mean Centered Moderation Comment by mluken February 27
• Hi, could you please provide an example or a screenshot so that I can investigate the issue? When I ran PROCESS on a test dataset, I could see the AIC and BIC as expected, so maybe there is an issue specific to your dataset. Thanks!

  in AIC and BIC in Process 0.19.2 Comment by mluken February 3
• The output for the model coefficients is very similar to the output of other Bayesian modules (e.g., Bayesian Linear Regression, Mixed-Models). For the model summary table and model comparison, this tutorial might be helpful: https://ecmerkle.github…

  in Bayesian Process output Comment by mluken November 2024
• The Classic Process Analysis has two types of missing value handling: Listwise deletion and Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) estimation. The Bayesian Process Analysis does not have this distinction due to its reliance on blavaan. It automa…

  in RE: Bayesian Process module Comment by mluken November 2024