patc3
About
- Username
- patc3
- Joined
- Visits
- 6,136
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
FIML doesn't impute data, so the chi square has the same interpretation (it is again a test of whether your model is able to reproduce the sample correlation matrix exactly)
-
Yes in Factor -> Confirmatory factor analysis, or via lavaan syntax in SEM -> Structural equation modeling
-
You are probably referring to versions 0.95.0 and 0.95.1. They came out about 1 month apart (end of July and end of August) and the new version currently available for download (0.95.1) has basically just bug fixes, so you should be good with the ne…
-
Example 1 seems to be interpreted correctly in the pdf you linked: (the "baseline model" in newer JASP versions, an apparent mistake): https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/466/JTTOBKOZQ3PQ.png the corresponding report: https://forum.cogsci.nl/…
-
No the documentation directly in the software when you click the i button next to the analysis name in the analysis panel (middle panel of the 3 panels) What's the problem with example 1 in the pdf you linked? The chi square compares your model to a…
-
No the error (if it is one) isn't corrected in 0.95 (the newest version). The chi square test of exact fit is almost always reported, so you should probably report it (look at other articles in your field to see what it commonly done). If the other …
-
OK yes I see the table header now, sorry. So I think writing baseline model there is an error, this is the user model, so what I wrote in my previous post still stands. This is a test that compares the correlation matrix implied by your model to the…
-
Can you show a screenshot for a bit more context? I'm in JASP 0.95 now and I don't see what you're describing in the output You can sometimes find info in the help file for any particular analysis: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/680/EHA8VH2FN2J7.pn…
-
wrong thread🙃
-
edit: never mind that's not it, I'm using 19.3 and I'm also unable to make sampling weights work This is probably not it, but there used to be a bug in SEM analysis where if you added a variable in your dataset after the SEM analysis was first creat…
-
yes more detail, and a more targeted/precise question, would be helpful
-
In the hamburger menu in the top left if you fo under Preferences then Interface, you might want to reduce the Zoom %: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/083/YWUY15KYVCJR.png
-
In case it helps: To display frequency tables for nominal variables you need to go at the bottom of the analysis options under the section "Tables" and check the option display frequency tables. Also if this is about the descriptives modul…
-
So exciteeeed
-
Did you fix your problem yet? If not, I suggest you file a ticket on GitHub, the dev team is generally pretty responsive: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/new?template=bug-report.yml (you need a free GitHub account) If you've updated…
-
There's several contrasts/post-hoc comparisons that might be of interest to you, notably: under Contrasts, you can pick "custom" and enter your own contrast coefficients (I think this is what you're looking for) https://forum.cogsci.nl/upl…
-
I think if you just change the "Value" entries manually to 0 and 1 instead of Male and Female, it might work
-
I think some of the comments here might help: https://forum.cogsci.nl/discussion/9659/how-to-transform-a-new-variable-in-jasp#latest
-
Previous versions are available here: https://jasp-stats.org/previous-versions/
-
hey it just occurred to me, you might not need the last for loop at all if you run in R, for example just this model string This still doesn't run in JASP and I think it's because where you can say variable.names="x" in coda.samples(), JAS…
-
By the way if you wanna check that the two models are approximately the same you should try with a LOT more missing data, e.g. nmiss=700 (or something extreme like that). You stand more chance of spotting a difference between the two models (if ther…
-
Hi Jonathan, you're very resourceful, yes I think conceptually this should be the same. Nicely done. Also it's a nice guess what you said about NAs, I don't know why it fails in JASP but it's a good guess.
-
Well, you're right that it runs in R but not in JASP, not sure why yet... this is the error I get (missing data go from x[991] to x[1000]) https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/959/G39EYMTFP0TS.png
-
why do you say it works in rjags but not in jasp? would it be possible to give the R code to run rjags as well so I can compare? I can see it doesn't work in JASP
-
Currently I doubt this is possible. Also some fields use different alpha values (cutoffs to declare significant) so I assume it would need to be customizable. You could make a feature request here: https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports…
-
If you're talking about cells resulting from a chi-square test (seeing as you're mentioning contingency tables in the title), then standardized (adjusted Pearson) residuals are interpreted as z scores, which carry no degrees of freedom. A z test is …
-
You can change preference for number of decimals in settings. You could set it to 0 or 1, the analysis will reload, and you can later re-change the setting if you want (mine is set to 3 decimals) https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/923/XIJGM317B6II.png
-
Yes there is a module you can add by clicking the blue plus sign in the right corner: https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/847/64W4JHH8NLQ0.png https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/102/68YSUJRJC9KG.png https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/287/MA5LI4XIAK12.png
-
You can do summary(lmm) to look at the output, and if you want all pairwise comparisons between your conditions, you can do: library(emmeans) emmeans(lmm, pairwise~Condition, adjust="none") To be able to use emmeans you will have to use th…
-
Within JASP you have a couple of options, one is simpler the other one is more involved (though neither is simple, unfortunately). Taking the example of repeated measures and modeling change over time, the first option is to use the R console module…