patc3
About
- Username
- patc3
- Joined
- Visits
- 7,985
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Hi JP21, I suppose you've done this already but while waiting for the user guide, you can take a look at the documentation for the linear mixed models analysis in JASP by click the "i" button in the analysis
-
Can you show an example of SPSS syntax of the analysis you want to replicate? (if you're going through the dialog boxes in SPSS, click "Paste")
-
to specify which paths are equal across groups, you need to set the labels to be the same across groups. For example, if you have two groups and want to fix the factor loading of cm1 to be equal across groups, your last line would be: "cm =~ c(…
-
It looks like JASP v0.17 uses FIML by default for both CFA and SEM, and you can change this option. If you prefer to use the SEM analysis in JASP instead of the CFA analysis you can specify the syntax for the measurement model manually (e.g. f1 =~ i…
-
This might not be ideal but as a temporary fix in the machine learning module you can uncheck "Scale variables" under "Training Parameters" (both for decision tree and SVM) For the regression module you get the coefficient of det…
-
Btw I tried some stuff but couldn't figure it out either... am curious to see as well
-
Seems to say you have fewer than 2 people in some group(s) in "prlang"
-
Edit: Sorry I spoke too fast, I tried with a factor predictor with more than 2 levels and I'm no longer reproducing the fixed effects, seeing as I would need to change the coding as you mention How did you get the chi-square in R? when I do the foll…
-
Hello, I'm also curious about this (seeing as the results are *very* different). Could I also check out the data or jasp file? My email is patrick.coulombe@d22consulting.com By the way R-hat of 1.145 seems to indicate the chains have not converged (…
-
(Adding info here for readers) The source of the discrepancy has been found and fixed: the number of principal components rather than the number of factors was being retrieved by JASP from the parallel analysis. See the corresponding pull request on…
-
@jpe @EJ I'm a little late to the show but the source of the discrepancy has been found and fixed: the number of principal components rather than the number of factors was being retrieved by JASP from the parallel analysis. See the corresponding pul…