vicente_inefo

Comments

• I understand your point but the reviewers, as a general rule, tend to "suggest" the use of this binary reasoning about statistical results. It's a pitty.

  in 95% CI for Cohen's d in post-hoc tests Comment by vicente_inefo May 2022
• Thanks for the reply @JohnnyB , Then I think is better not to report the Cohen's d in the paper we are writing because it could be confusing, isn't it?

  in 95% CI for Cohen's d in post-hoc tests Comment by vicente_inefo April 2022
• Yes, it is. Was added in the Reliability module.

  in Intraclass correlation coefficien (ICC) in JASP? Comment by vicente_inefo January 2022
• Ok thanks for the explanation, I expect this release could be soon

  in Scatter plot? Comment by vicente_inefo March 2020
• I have been thinking about it and I would like to express one possible idea, it would be great if someone could help me. I have noticed that JASP compute Cohen's d by the formula d = t/sqrt(n), isn't it? Then, if the post-hoc test reports the t val…

  in Cohen's d does not correct for multiple comparisons Comment by vicente_inefo October 2019
• I'sorry but I don't understand your answer, do you mean that you have transmitted this suggestion?

  in Unbalanced non-parametric mixed ANOVA? Comment by vicente_inefo June 2019
• Hi JohnnyB, Thanks for the replay. These are very good news for the next release, I'm so impatient...

  in Durbin Test - non-parametric mixed ANOVA Comment by vicente_inefo May 2019
• Hi, Maybe I don't understand well the output but I was wondering several questions related with this topic: Why is not possible to run... an unbalanced non-parametric mixed ANOVA? between post-hoc test? interaction post-hoc test? Thanks in advance.

  in Durbin Test - non-parametric mixed ANOVA Comment by vicente_inefo May 2019