vins
Hi,
I analyzed my data with RM anova using SPSS (I have 4 RMfactors : Canale (8 levels) , Emisfero (2 levels), Sequenza(4 levels) and Task( 3 levels)
after revision the reviewer said "....the authors should then run Bayesian statistics to show that the null hypothesis is indeed true"
I tried to use JASP bayesian RM anova , the table reports RManova results and BF inclusion
Could someone help me to interpret the BF inclusion?
About
- Username
- vins
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Hi , I have run bayesian RM anova and in post hoc comparisons I read BF10, U which means U? could you help me?
-
Hi EJ, the estimated Bayes inclusion factor for the effect of "task" indicated that the data were infinite times in favour of the alternative hypothesis (relative to all alternative models)... is it correct?
-
Thank you very much best Vins
-
Hi, I analyzed my data with RM anova using SPSS (I have 4 RMfactors : Canale (8 levels) , Emisfero (2 levels), Sequenza(4 levels) and Task( 3 levels) after revision the reviewer said "....the authors should then run Bayesian statistics to sho…