Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

Quality Control - Capability

When calculating capability for non-normal data the estimation of the parameters for e.g. Weibull distribution does not align with the Maximum likelihood estimates using the Distributions tool. Comparing with other applications (Minitab, R) the estimated parameters from Distributions are correct. How are the parameters estimated in Quality Control - Capability, and how to use the maximum likelihood approach?

Comments

  • Realize it should have been posted in JASP forum - will post it there, do not know how to delete a post ;-)

Sign In or Register to comment.