EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,597
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Dear Michael, Thanks for the kind words and the suggestions. We will take these under consideration. One of the problems is that nobody knowns how this situation will evolve. As these tools become commonplace, it is not unthinkable that one or two y…
-
I am told the reason why you have to wait for initialization so long is because Microsoft is running all sorts of checks in the background....but should take 10 s not more. Otherwise please post on our GitHub page EJ
-
My LLM gives a pretty extensive answer -- have you tried? EJ
-
Oh it's out already I see! EJ
-
Today I hope, maybe tomorrow EJ
-
I'm asking our expert
-
Good that you figured it out...took me a while myself too :-) EJ
-
I have attended our expert to this. In general I think this seems more of an issue for our GitHub page -- if you post the issue there (maybe with a screenshot) then it can be assigned and fixed by a team member. For details see https://jasp-stats.or…
-
This is a serious bug that we are already aware of. A hot-fix is on its way!
-
Yes makes sense. I would add this reference: @ARTICLE{LiangEtAl2008, AUTHOR = {Liang, F. and Paulo, R. and Molina, G. and Clyde, M. A. and Berger, J. O.}, TITLE = {Mixtures of $g$ Priors for {B}ayesian Variable Selection}, JOURNAL = {Jour…
-
This is a tricky issue. Ideally we'd have a BF for a parameter ANOVA model that relaxes the assumption of sphericity; we don't have that yet. If the p-values do not change much, it can be argued that the BF will not change much either... EJ
-
Forwarded to our expert... EJ
-
I think this is an issue for our GitHub page - for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/
-
Yes we are working on analysis-specific filters
-
Planned for a future release. You can request/upvote it on our GitHub page. It should work using the BayesFactor package in R.
-
Or something as described here: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/egydq
-
Difficult to say. Can you share the data or show a screenshot?
-
I'll bring this to the attention of our experts!
-
It could be a feature request on our GitHub page: in the Preferences, we can add an option "Show data preview".
-
Even though I have not found the need to adjust anything, it strikes me as very useful...why would you want it turned off?
-
Can you DM me with your preferred name and email address so we can add you? EJ (EJ.Wagenmakers@gmail.com)
-
Well what frequentist models do also depends on whether you use Type I, II, or III sums of squares. But anyway, I don't think that "across matched models" gives you the best summary of the full model table. EJ
-
Ah yes. I did come across this issue before. As a JASP team member suggested to me, "complex tabulate analysis, in the style of SAS proc tabulate (https://documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/v_072/proc/n1ql5xnu0k3kdtn11gwa5hc7u435.htm) and …
-
I'll bring this to the attention of our expert.
-
Can you explain the purpose of the module a bit more? JASP already produces what I consider to be publication-ready tables. EJ
-
Can you share the data, kwellstein?
-
My bad, this happens by default and it's mentioned in the model specification!
-
Yes, but they were explicitly added to the null model, which should have happened automatically