EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,557
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Well, if you compare different models you get different BFs of course. What models you wish to compare is not a trivial matter. There is the issue of matched models, and there is the related issue of the principle of marginality (i.e., should it be …
-
This strikes me more as a confirmatory factor analysis?! EJ
-
Definitely! EJ
-
I've asked the team Cheers, E.J.
-
I've asked the team Cheers, E.J.
-
I've asked the team! EJ
-
I recommend this for an overview: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/s56mk We use this in ANOVA as a correction for post-hoc t-tests. (the Jeffreys/Westfall correction) EJ
-
The upcoming version of JASP will have hierarchical regression implemented in a more intuitive way. I will ask a team member to elaborate. Cheers, E.J.
-
Hello Faming, Do you mean Shapley values? Can you include a link or citation to clarify the concept you are referring to? Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Christoph, If you are testing the difference between two proportions, I would recommend the AB-test instead (see for instance https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/z64th) You can find many papers on this test on my website (https://www.ejwagenmakers.…
-
Hi Mor, I think it would help if you show a concrete analysis with some screenshots...and have you read the background literature? Cheers, E.J.
-
It would be useful to know what the numerical precision is for which the BF produces "infinity". There is an argument that the BF ought to be reported as "> x" where x is the maximum precision, instead of "infinity".…
-
Would be a good feature request! EJ
-
Hi Debora, This is not mentioned in the help file? And the help file does not point to an R package? I will ask a team member to look into this Cheers, EJ
-
Dear Abhay, That will not work. But it would be a good feature request! (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Cheers, E.J.
-
Indeed, small effects in the sample are more likely to arise from the null model than from the alternative model. Some discussion on this is at https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/52486656/s41593_020_0660_4.pdf EJ
-
We are in the process of testing the new version now! EJ
-
Also, it seems more of an issue for our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) EJ
-
Yes this would be very good for the team to know. There might be reasons why the code is executed again (perhaps some results are discarded when the file is closed in order to keep the file from exploding in size), but I am not sure. EJ
-
This looks like something for our GitHub page! (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/)
-
The help file should be helpful. Also, it will contain references to the literature.
-
The help file should give you more information I hope?
-
I think you've found this in the meantime, right?
-
You mean you want the white nodes to have a color? I am not sure what is going on -- please create an issue on our GitHub page so one of our programmers can take a look (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-ja…
-
Dear Agata, I think it is best to take this topic to our GitHub page (https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) as you'll be in direct contact with our programming team and they are the ones that need to help you out. Cheer…
-
What default behavior would be better? Could you suggest something on our GitHub page? (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) EJ
-
This may be a bug (at least the error message is not informative) -- best to post this on the GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Cheers, E.J.
-
Maybe it is a lavaan issue. I am not sure -- if you create a GitHub issue we will look into it E.J.
-
Thanks for the update, and good to hear! EJ