EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,557
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Correct, andersony3k. In addition, note that we have recently updated our RM Bayesian methodology to be more in line with the frequentist one. See this blog post and associated article: https://jasp-stats.org/2022/07/29/bayesian-repeated-measures-an…
-
Dear SA, So we are dealing with the scenario where the data are clearly in violation of these assumptions, meaning that the violations invalidate the usual test. In that case, I would be tempted to explore particular transformations (e.g., the log).…
-
If you could send a concrete data set that would help. Also, comparison to the classical methodology could be useful.
-
I've attended our expert to this EJ
-
First of all, it is recommended to use the latest version. If you wait a day or so, you can get the brand new 0.17.3. Then: Under "Additional options" -> "Repeatability", you can set a seed, which will yield the same result. U…
-
As an aside, I am not getting any notifications (I contacted Sebastiaan already)
-
I forwarded this to our expert E.J.
-
Yes, I am having the same problem EJ
-
I forwarded this to our expert EJ
-
I am not sure whether this issue has resolved itself, but This is (or was?) valuable information for our programmers, whom you can best reach through our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/…
-
It would be a good feature request for our GitHub page! (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) However, we do offer the Amaroso distribution, and this nests a fairly large number of simpler models -- I w…
-
I've forwarded this to our expert! E.J.
-
I don't think this is a known issue, and we'd love to fix it -- thanks for bringing this to our attention. Could you make an issue on our GitHub page? (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) This needs a …
-
I suspect it is the long vs wide format (just a guess). Have you gone to the JASP Data Library and looked at the way we code other ANOVA analyses? E.J.
-
I would add that the team is eager to solve problems like these! But the best way to contact them is through our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/). This Forum is meant for interpretation…
-
I'll ask our expert. Sorry for the tardy response, I stopped getting emails from the Forum for some reason.
-
Well, there has been a big change in our RM BANOVA, so you should definitely upgrade to the latest version. See for instance https://jasp-stats.org/2022/07/29/bayesian-repeated-measures-anova-an-updated-methodology-implemented-in-jasp/ Cheers, E.J.
-
Good suggestion -- because if the scale is text, this cannot be changed to anything else (for good reason).
-
You've set a pretty narrow prior here, and nevertheless you have quite some evidence for H0. This suggests that the data show a pattern that is actually opposite the one predicted by H+. It may help to look at the descriptives (raincloud plot for in…
-
I passed this on to our expert
-
But the prior structure differs depending on the scale (continuous vs nominal) EJ
-
To the extent that the categorical variable "looks like" a scale variable, this will work. For instance, scores on an IQ test are not really continuous (they are integers), but we always treat them as such. The main problem is with nominal…
-
Not yet, but it is under development. I will let our expert know that you are eagerly awaiting this functionality :-) E.J.
-
Strange. Could you let the team know on GitHub? E.J.
-
I would start with the help file and the references therein. Also, I am sure the various YouTube videos cover this...let me look...yes, just go to YouTube and search for "factor analysis in JASP" Cheers, E.J.
-
It is under Regression -> "Generalized Linear model" E.J.
-
The module settings are reactivated when you restart JASP. So if you have the "Power" module activated on the ribbon, and you close and restart JASP, the "Power" module should still be present on the ribbon. Cheers, E.J.
-
Dear Grzegorz, In this case, isn't the design effectively a one-way ANOVA? And we do offer eta^2 for those designs... Cheers, E.J.
-
Or maybe this is the same as https://forum.cogsci.nl/discussion/8607/nominal-by-continuous-variable-crosstab-eta-in-jasp#latest -- let continue the discussion there
-
Dear Stan, Could you be a bit more specific? If you refer to the effect size measure, the eta is generally used in ANOVA designs, and we offer it there. Are you referring to something else? In this case a link to an existing procedure in R and in SP…