EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,531
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Hi Justin, There is no work-around yet, AFAIK. Cheers, E.J.
-
:-) Well the 0.15 release took a lot of effort, with lots and lots of work hidden from view, meaning it is key to check everything really carefully.
-
We are in the last stages of checking the new version
-
The team member who is ideally suited to implement this has had his hands full, but I am occasionally reminding him that this would be a great feature to add! Cheers, E.J.
-
This depends on what kind of Bayesian you are. A subjective Bayesian will have a prior plausibility assignment for every possible hypothesis. Data come in, the plausibilities are updated, and that's it. No adjustment needed. An objective Bayesian w…
-
Can you be a little more precise? Maybe a concrete example will help, with links to existing methodology (say in R) Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Guan, Could you show a screenshot? Cheers, E.J.
-
As you can see from the code, the error is thrown by lavaan. We can look at it, but ultimately we might refer you to the lavaan community. We'll have to see. Cheers, E.J.
-
Yes, no option now, but I assume a graphics editor will do the job Cheers, E.J.
-
I'm not sure, but I think the first question is whether you'd expect the same result without the mediator, and I don't think you do. See for instance https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/22718/what-is-the-difference-between-linear-regression-on…
-
In discrete data models, the log likelihood will always be negative (b/c the data is associated with probabilities). In continuous data models, the log likelihood is about the density, and that may be lower than 1 as well. Likelihood is defined up t…
-
Hi Martyna Yes, you can report that. Or you can rerun the procedure several times and get an idea of the % that way. And thanks for your kind words! Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Ming, The method that JASP uses depends on the specific analysis problem. We try to use analytic solutions whenever we can, or integrate out variables before switching to a numerical procedure. Most often we integrate over a single parameter, but…
-
I agree it is wrong in the sense that there is nothing in between the discrete categories. However, the lines often make it easier to see the pattern (perhaps not in this case). Ideally the lines would be optional. I'll make a note of this. Cheers, …
-
I've attended the relevant team member to this. E.J.
-
I'll ask our expert. E.J.
-
This is strange. In fact, it should not happen, because a 95% CI contains all the values that would not be rejected using an alpha=5% test. The conflict could be due to the noise in the bootstrap...can you provide a concrete example so we can reprod…
-
I'll ask our expert E.J.
-
Hmm we'll provide more descriptive graphs in the upcoming release, but not this one, and I agree it it useful. I'll make a note of this. You could also make it a GitHub issue (https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Cheer…
-
Hmm this is really strange. It would be great if you could make an issue of this on our GitHub page. See https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/. You are using JASP 0.14.1? Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Myrthe Yes, we generally also find that the Bayesian results are more in line with the frequentist results from lme4. In the preprint that Johnny mentioned you'll see a discussion of adding those random slopes. I agree with you that these models …
-
Hello Hoon, In order to add the information to the plot you will have to save it (note that we offer a range of options, including pdf) and add the desired information using some graph editing software (e.g., adobe). Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Cathy, JASP offers a range of different priors, but all of them are designed to work for *testing*. My suspicion is that brms uses default priors that are designed to work for *estimation*. But I'd look up the brms documentation to see what prior…
-
Hello Manhervart, This would be a good bug report for our GitHub page -- see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/ for details. Cheers, E.J.
-
This is strange. If you post this issue on our GitHub page then one of our programmers can help you out. They will probably need more information in order to reproduce the issue. For details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-repo…
-
I'll forward this to our expert! E.J.
-
Yes, that's the plan Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Anabela, I'll forward this to our expert but I think he might need some more concrete guidance on what the data look like, what you've already tried, and what you seek to accomplish. Cheers, E.J.
-
Ah, good point, I'll bring this to the attention of our experts on this topic. Cheers, E.J.
-
hmm I can't even find the Durbin test. Can you attach a screenshot? I'll forward this to our ANOVA expert. Cheers, E.J.