EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,531
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Thanks for the suggestion. This is definitely an idea that is on our agenda, but we have some bigger fish to fry first... Cheers, E.J.
-
[Solution at the end] Strange. I can get the second number. So, in R: prior.odds <- .4/.6 posterior.odds <- .1524/(1-.1524) posterior.odds/prior.odds [1] 0.2697027 [The table gives 0.28, but that is probably just rounding] I'm not really getti…
-
Dear JLeborgne, Thanks for the suggestion (NB. on the JASP GitHub page, you can choose between "bug report" and "feature request" -- but I'll pass this on). To respond: We will add more plotting options to RM ANOVA, similar to wh…
-
Hi mdt, Point taken, but logistic regression is actually relatively well documented. Granted, details on the robust standard errors appear to be missing. I'll ask the team member who implemented this! Cheers, E.J.
-
Dear Zambia, You have seen have you seen this: https://jasp-stats.org/2020/03/12/mediation-and-moderation-analysis-in-jasp/ Cheers, E.J.
-
Well, I think you could consult the work by de Vries and Morey: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005789414001300 It should have references to classical tests as well I think Cheers, E.J.
-
I suggest contacting Herbert Hoijtink, since BAIN is his baby :-) Let us know what he says! E.J.
-
Hi August, Yes. In the upcoming version you can save the graphs as pptx, which allows you to edit them. E.J.
-
We will be testing the new version this week! Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Garycarmel, If you take a look at https://jasp-stats.org/2020/06/09/finished-the-jasp-data-library-1st-ed/ the last chapter is on missing data. In the future we hope to do something more fancy. E.J.
-
We have this under development. So it will be possible soon, but not right now! Cheers, E.J.
-
Also, I am not sure but perhaps this helps: https://forum.cogsci.nl/discussion/5976/auto-estimator-in-sem-mediation-module E.J.
-
Hi new2jasp, I'll attend our expert to this issue! Cheers E.J.
-
Thanks. I also noticed that the png files are broken, as they were on an earlier post. Maybe the platform does not like png files.... E.J.
-
Dear Kindred, The links to the png's are broken, so I cannot see those. Without visual support, here is some comment on the text: "A Bayesian Repeated Measures ANOVA revealed that the data are 392.34 (BF01) times more likely under the model th…
-
I'll contact the team member (Johnny) who should know. E.J.
-
I'll ask but I don't think this is possible. However, the upcoming new version will have an R console in which this would of course be relatively straightforward. Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Yvonne, Thanks for reporting this! We are just about to do a new version, so this is perfect timing. I'll forward this to Johnny. For future occasions, it would be great if you could use our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/201…
-
Hi Louis, From a quick scan, it seems like you'd indeed be doing an ANCOVA. This seems fine, but you have 4 dependent variables, so it looks like this might be cause for a MANCOVA. However, I see we only offer the MANOVA -- let me add the MANCOVA to…
-
Hi Grover, Can you attach a zip file and upload that? If not, you could email Joris (a list of email addresses is at https://jasp-stats.org/team/) E.J.
-
Hi fweber144, That's awesome! In the future we'd definitely like to offer something like this in JASP, but it may take us a while. Cheers, E.J.
-
Strange. I asked the team about this (maybe it was you, on the mail) and they were unsure what happened. I'll forward this post to them (GitHub is easiest for trouble-shooting, but let's see -- the team will need some more information for sure) Chee…
-
Dear Pat, I'll ask the team, but I am not aware of any limitations. Note that we also offer a preinstalled zip file for Windows -- unpacking the zip and clicking on JASP.exe should launch the program. Your student can also contact us for support on …
-
Hi JDB, Asking the same question on different fora is a good idea! I have never really looked into the interpretation of eta-squared. I know that some people like to convert all effect sizes to r; if that's legit and possible for eta-squared, it cou…
-
Hi ABC_95, The top entry is always 1, since the model on the first row is compared to itself. So the model with only "difficulty" is best, predicting the data 6.67 times better than the model that adds image type, and predicting the data a…
-
Hi ABC_95, If you select "compare to best model" and tick "BF01" then you'll immediately see how much better the best model predicts compare to its competitors. The comparison to the null is often not so interesting, because it p…
-
Dear profkeji, Thanks. I think this is more of a feature request; it is easiest to add these using our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Cheers, E.J.
-
I'll ask our expert! E.J.
-
Hi Vukasin, Great question. Anything will work, just as long as the prior distribution still makes sense. For instance, on our JASP post about this (https://jasp-stats.org/2020/05/12/how-to-conduct-a-bayesian-model-averaged-meta-analysis-in-jasp/) w…