peterose1

Comments

• Thanks, EJ. I don't see Support Vector Machines, but the classification icon sure looks like one!

  in rCNN CNN Comment by peterose1 September 2020
• Hi EJ, I just knew it! Best, Peter

  in Cohen's d and Bayes Factor Comment by peterose1 March 2019
• Thanks, JonnyB. We are doing a 2-sample comparison, so can use JASP. Regards, Peter

  in Bayes Factors for non-parametric tests Comment by peterose1 March 2019
• OK, let us know. Thanks.

  in correction for sphericity in repeated measure anovas.. Comment by peterose1 February 2019
• Thanks, EJ

  in Describing and justifying priors Comment by peterose1 August 2018
• Thank you. I am downloading he paper now. But meanwhile, I conclude my other interpretation is correct: "a model including the interaction term is more strongly supported than one without it." Yes? (I am BoomChicago dad.)

  in RM ANOVA - extrem diverging main effects - interpretation of the interaction effect Comment by peterose1 March 2017
• Is the result of Francesco's division (BF10 = 33) strong evidence of a pure interaction effect? It seems to me to state only that a model including the interaction term is more strongly supported than one without it.

  in RM ANOVA - extrem diverging main effects - interpretation of the interaction effect Comment by peterose1 March 2017