Avatar

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

EJ

About

Username
EJ
Joined
Visits
2,557
Last Active
Roles
Member, Administrator, Moderator

Comments

  • Right now this is not possible. Of course the graph allows the user to try out some values near the threshold, but it is not autimatized. This would be a good feature request for our GitHub page. E.J.
  • This should be easy to figure out with generated data (for instance using the Distribution module). But perhaps we should clarify this. I'll ask the team.
  • Hi Daniela, I'm forwarding your email, but the person in charge of this analysis has just gone on vacation so responding might be a little more slow. E.J.
  • Dear Laura, I am referring to resampling itself. I do realize the resampling is handy in the present context, because otherwise you need some sort of complicated time series model (which will almost certainly be misspecified). This is definitely int…
  • Dear AstralWolf, This is because the ANOVA scenario is more complex. But maybe something is possible here. A good feature question for our GitHub page! Cheers, E.J.
  • Hi Laura The jackknife is a resampling technique, right? When you're doing a Bayesian analysis that is not needed. But I guess I should look up the Kiesel paper... Cheers, E.J.
  • That would be very welcome -- I'll check E.J.
  • Hello buzziol, We're working hard to make it easier to obtain the R code underlying the computations. This is work in progress, but it is our main goal for the near future. Cheers, E.J.
  • Thanks. Yes but I think a lot of people will cite papers instead of software, especially since we have papers about the software :-)
    in JASP 0.17 Comment by EJ July 2022
  • Hi Joshua, From your description it seems you want to conduct a *paired* samples t-test (each species is tallied in two areas, and I suppose you want to test whether the one area has more bees than another area?). So then you simply select the paire…
  • Hi Peter, We'll have JASP 1.0 once the data-editing and R syntax are included -- we are working hard on both projects. Wrt the seriousness, I guess the question is motivated by the fact that JASP is so user-friendly :-) Anyway, yes, JASP is very ser…
    in JASP 0.17 Comment by EJ July 2022
  • Hi Per, We're aiming for another release with new functionality end of September, with the 0.17 hopefully soon after. Cheers, E.J.
    in JASP 0.17 Comment by EJ July 2022
  • You can check out the release notes or the associated blog posts: https://jasp-stats.org/2022/04/19/introducing-jasp-0-16-2-performance-improvements-apple-silicon-and-bug-fixes/ and https://jasp-stats.org/2022/06/16/introducing-jasp-0-16-3-quality-c…
    in JASP 0.16.3.0 Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Dear Vasileia, The ANOVA is usually robust to violations of normality. Specifically, this paper (https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-017-0918-2) suggests that when the min vs max variance ratio < 1.5, the results should be robust. Of…
    in Data analysis Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Hi bdgp9636, With "proper" do you mean "robust"? And did you have a specific procedure in mind? Are you doing the classical meta-analysis or the Bayesian meta-analysis? Cheers, E.J.
  • I think this would be a good feature request! Cheers, E.J.
  • Hi Stanislaw, I'll ask around. If it crashes R, it will crash JASP. But I am not sure whether it will work in R but not in JASP... Cheers, E.J.
    in Big data set Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Hi Michael, Thanks for this interesting question. My two cents: Yes your summary is adequate. Note that the problems originate because the models are misspecified. In general, when the models are badly misspecified, all sorts of statistical havoc ma…
  • When you do any inference on time series data, it is important to take into account the autocorrelation. With high autocorrelation you effectively have much less than N independent observations. Currently we don't really offer tests for autocorrelat…
    in lstm Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Yes, but Koen, isn't it worrying that the results would differ a lot depending on the seed?
    in Machine learning Comment by EJ June 2022
  • How different are the results? Most of ML is based on resampling algorithms so results are expected to differ -- but if they differ by a lot than this would be surprising to me. E.J.
    in Machine learning Comment by EJ June 2022
  • So you want to divide by N instead of N-1, is that what you mean? If I'm not mistaken you can take the SD from JASP, multiply by [sqrt(1/N) / sqrt(1/(N-1))] and you should get the result you want. I did this very quickly though, so best to check! A…
  • The method for correction can be the same as that applied for post-hoc tests in ANOVA. See the thesis by Tim de Jong for details: https://psyarxiv.com/s56mk Cheers, E.J.
  • Hi Ana, I'm sure you can put everything in a single model, but I'd keep things simple and conduct two separate analyses. Cheers, E.J.
  • We'll soon (this week, hopefully) preprint a paper in which we outline a problem with the currently standard way of specifying RM models in BayesFactor.
  • Hi Marthapapa, I'm afraid that I have never used circular statistics myself. I think I can only advise you to talk with an expert for this particular analysis (it was a contributed module, so the other JASP team members are not experts either I thin…
  • Hi Marijn, This is not yet possible. Well, I guess with some categorical variables it would be an ANCOVA... Cheers, E.J.
  • Yes, so Richard confirms that it would just be an unbalanced design in that case, which the Bayesian model handles.
  • The BayesFactor models are in fact linear mixed models. Let me get confirmation from Richard, also on the missing data aspect.