Avatar

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Supported by

EJ

About

Username
EJ
Joined
Visits
2,597
Last Active
Roles
Member, Administrator, Moderator

Comments

  • Great that you found it. I often forget about this one myself, and we have been thinking of creating a separate, visible button for this somewhere. But we can't seem to reach agreement on the exact implementation, and whether it would be worthwhile…
  • Dear Wang, Maybe it would be clearer if we'd use the term "Parameter Prior" instead of "Prior". The parameter prior partly defines the prediction that a model makes, and through these predictions it affects the evidence and there…
  • Dear CCtt, The first entry compares the model against itself, so it is always 1.00. Looking at the table quickly, it seems you have some evidence for the null -- highly ambiguous in the case of Test Delay, but more impressive for the other factors. …
  • I'll forward this to the programming team. Note that we have a GitHub page that is ideal for reporting such concerns, as you will be in touch with the team directly! For details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/ …
  • Dear emurray4, You are correct, the interface for Descriptives has recently been upgraded in order to reduce clutter and keep things simple. The new interface offers more options than before, so there is no reason to revert to an earlier version. I …
  • Hi Leigh, I'm forwarding this to our expert. Cheers, E.J.
  • Hi Daniela, I think this may take another 10 days or so. Cheers, E.J.
  • This has been suggested before (you can check our GitHub page, which can be used both for feature requests and bug reports; for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/). I realize this is handy, but at the same…
  • Not currently. We welcome translators to add Hebrew! See https://jasp-stats.org/translation-guidelines/ Cheers, E.J.
    in HEBREW Comment by EJ August 2022
  • Right now this is not possible. Of course the graph allows the user to try out some values near the threshold, but it is not autimatized. This would be a good feature request for our GitHub page. E.J.
  • This should be easy to figure out with generated data (for instance using the Distribution module). But perhaps we should clarify this. I'll ask the team.
  • Hi Daniela, I'm forwarding your email, but the person in charge of this analysis has just gone on vacation so responding might be a little more slow. E.J.
  • Dear Laura, I am referring to resampling itself. I do realize the resampling is handy in the present context, because otherwise you need some sort of complicated time series model (which will almost certainly be misspecified). This is definitely int…
  • Dear AstralWolf, This is because the ANOVA scenario is more complex. But maybe something is possible here. A good feature question for our GitHub page! Cheers, E.J.
  • Hi Laura The jackknife is a resampling technique, right? When you're doing a Bayesian analysis that is not needed. But I guess I should look up the Kiesel paper... Cheers, E.J.
  • That would be very welcome -- I'll check E.J.
  • Hello buzziol, We're working hard to make it easier to obtain the R code underlying the computations. This is work in progress, but it is our main goal for the near future. Cheers, E.J.
  • Thanks. Yes but I think a lot of people will cite papers instead of software, especially since we have papers about the software :-)
    in JASP 0.17 Comment by EJ July 2022
  • Hi Joshua, From your description it seems you want to conduct a *paired* samples t-test (each species is tallied in two areas, and I suppose you want to test whether the one area has more bees than another area?). So then you simply select the paire…
  • Hi Peter, We'll have JASP 1.0 once the data-editing and R syntax are included -- we are working hard on both projects. Wrt the seriousness, I guess the question is motivated by the fact that JASP is so user-friendly :-) Anyway, yes, JASP is very ser…
    in JASP 0.17 Comment by EJ July 2022
  • Hi Per, We're aiming for another release with new functionality end of September, with the 0.17 hopefully soon after. Cheers, E.J.
    in JASP 0.17 Comment by EJ July 2022
  • You can check out the release notes or the associated blog posts: https://jasp-stats.org/2022/04/19/introducing-jasp-0-16-2-performance-improvements-apple-silicon-and-bug-fixes/ and https://jasp-stats.org/2022/06/16/introducing-jasp-0-16-3-quality-c…
    in JASP 0.16.3.0 Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Dear Vasileia, The ANOVA is usually robust to violations of normality. Specifically, this paper (https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-017-0918-2) suggests that when the min vs max variance ratio < 1.5, the results should be robust. Of…
    in Data analysis Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Hi bdgp9636, With "proper" do you mean "robust"? And did you have a specific procedure in mind? Are you doing the classical meta-analysis or the Bayesian meta-analysis? Cheers, E.J.
  • I think this would be a good feature request! Cheers, E.J.
  • Hi Stanislaw, I'll ask around. If it crashes R, it will crash JASP. But I am not sure whether it will work in R but not in JASP... Cheers, E.J.
    in Big data set Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Hi Michael, Thanks for this interesting question. My two cents: Yes your summary is adequate. Note that the problems originate because the models are misspecified. In general, when the models are badly misspecified, all sorts of statistical havoc ma…
  • When you do any inference on time series data, it is important to take into account the autocorrelation. With high autocorrelation you effectively have much less than N independent observations. Currently we don't really offer tests for autocorrelat…
    in lstm Comment by EJ June 2022
  • Yes, but Koen, isn't it worrying that the results would differ a lot depending on the seed?
    in Machine learning Comment by EJ June 2022