EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,597
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Good to hear it's solved!
-
Maybe the new version solved the problem?!
-
Have you tried turning "safe graphics" on in preferences? If that does not fix the problem, please let our programmers know on the JASP GitHub page! Cheers, E.J.
-
Yes, I asked the team to provide an alternative color scheme
-
https://forum.cogsci.nl/uploads/946/3XVPH7Z9AN5Q.jpg So here is an example of the tile heat map in Descriptives. Basically, each tile represents a slice of the data. On top of each tile is some information. For instance, you can see that women with …
-
OK I commented on the bar charts on GitHub. Will look at the heat maps soon. E.J.
-
OK it is clear that this needs another look from me. I am not eager to do this as I recall the Gunel and Dickey paper was not easy to understand (conceptually their approach was clear, but mathematically things weren't completely spelled out) E.J.
-
Dear nbarden, Yes, this means something went wrong when saving the csv. If you open the csv in Excel or Calc, say, you have different options to open it and save it; it takes some tinkering to get it right (maybe the separator should be a comma, not…
-
Hmm I'll pass this on to our expert, but I think the results show that "Tenure" is in fact highly significant (as is also evident from the plot). If the odds ratio is indeed for a single unit (i.e., month) this does tend to cause a large e…
-
Dear H_K, Right now I think we offer only the generic version. I agree that it would be nice to add other experimental designs. This would be a great feature request on our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-featu…
-
Thanks. We'll have a small release soon (this mainly fixes some installation issues we've been having, and improves things internally) quickly followed by a release with a lot more new functionality. Cheers, E.J.
-
I've just responded (in that right place)
-
Hi Paula, These are two separate issues: "I need help figuring out the new HEAT map function in descriptives (since 0.16). Haven't figured out how to make it work." Can you be more precise? I had trouble understanding it myself when I firs…
-
I'll bring this to Simon's attention again Cheers, E.J.
-
The new signed installer and zip can be found here: https://static.jasp-stats.org/JASP-SKF-0.16.2.1.msi https://static.jasp-stats.org/JASP-SKF-0.16.2.1.zip NB there is basically a small bug in the installer, where the following happens: - install 0.…
-
:-) great
-
We have this in the SKF version, which has not yet been integrated in the public version of JASP. We can send you the latest SKF version when we've done some checks. Please remind me if you don't get it within a week.
-
I'll forward this to our expert. This seems like a bug though, in which case a report on GitHub would be most welcome. But I'll have our expert look at this first. E.J.
-
Hi Erin, If you are referring to the standard errors, this is because the ANOVA model uses a pooled error term. It would help to see screenshots indicating the difference, because right now your question is a little abstract :-) Cheers, E.J.
-
I'm with Frantisek here: just be transparent about the number of tests you did. E.J.
-
Thanks -- can you maybe answer your own question, for the benefit of the other users who may hit upon your post? Cheers, E.J.
-
Yes that's correct. Note that the interpretation of the posterior probability depends on the prior probability. So if you want to mention that I would say that the evidence increased the prior probability from X (whatever it was) to almost 100%. Che…
-
Hi Leonardo_C, Yes, you don't want a partial correlation. As of yet, filters are not analysis-specific. I guess you could re-order the data set such that each column is the class of objects you are interested in, but it is suboptimal. Maybe a GitHub…
-
Available here: https://static.jasp-stats.org/Nightlies/
-
Hi Mike, It is a prior, which means that it reflects the relative prior plausibility of the values for effect size. You can use the default settings, but if you know more then you can change the defaults. For instance, you may know the direction of …
-
I don't think this is possible at the moment. Maybe a good feature request for our GitHub page... (https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Ladislas -- good point, right now the interim information is not directly accessible other than by visually inspecting the plot. If you create a GitHub feature request to present this information in a table I'll take care of things. E.J.
-
Informed priors are more narrow/precise than default priors; this carries over to the posterior. Effect sizes may be smaller or larger with an informed prior depending on the situation, but what happens is that the observed effect size is pulled to …
-
I'll comment on the first analysis: this is fine, except for the formulation "Evidence strongly suggests that the observed data are 15.93 times more likely to occur under a model which contains an interaction between Time and Group." It is…
-
You can compare them using Descriptives (e.g., plotting histograms etc.). For statistical tests: When each row corresponds to one participant/machine/unit, you have a paired-sample t-test (in the case of two columns; otherwise it is a one-way ANOVA)…