EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,597
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Hi Chuan-Peng, "Row-column independence" means that there is no association between the rows and the columns; so knowing the value of a column ("women" or "men") does not provide any hint as to the value of the row (&qu…
-
There are multiple complications here. First you have both subjects and clips, so I think this calls for a crossed-random effects analysis. Then you have multiple dependent variables -- we don't have a Bayesian MANOVA yet, but maybe the mixed models…
-
Hi ClintR, What you could do is use any textbook on this topic, and analyse the example data with JASP. Our machine learning module was inspired by James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learni…
-
Dear PariShad, I don't think you need to add subjects as a between-subjects factor; the analysis should automatically do this. [As an aside, with only 5 participants, I wonder whether it even makes sense to conduct this analysis at all -- I hope you…
-
Hi Jonathan, This is really frustrating. I do believe we have this fixed, but I am not sure. This is a typical GitHub topic though. I'll forward this one to the team though. Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Stefan, Good point! We should also present some of that estimation information in a table, btw. I've created a feature request on our GitHub page (in the future you can do this yourself as well; for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/r…
-
I'll ask the network folks
-
Yes they do. Ranks are much more robust in general.
-
Sample size and t-statistic are sufficient, meaning that no additional information is needed and no information is lost through this summary (as far as inference is concerned). With sample size and t-statistic in hand, you can indeed conduct the Bay…
-
The team never sleeps, and informs me the latest development version also should not crash. You can find it here: https://static.jasp-stats.org/Nightlies/
-
Hi Fabrice, Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I will ask the team, but I do believe we have fixed this RM ANOVA bug. We are also fixing the slowness issue as you have seen -- some basic restructuring has taken place. A new version should be…
-
So clicking on the filter icon and then using the litter bin does not work? If that does not work (it does for me) please make an issue on the GitHub page. Cheers, E.J.
-
This happens when the data are more likely under H0 than under any of the competing models. So there is some evidence for the absence of a treatment effect (or whatever effect is under study), although the strength of that evidence need not be stro…
-
That is definitely a bug. Thanks for reporting! Should you find any others, it works best if you create an issue on our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Peter, Good point. I noticed that in the Learn Bayes module, this is not present either; I think that would be the place for it. I'll attend Frantisek (who has programmed the relevant part of the Learn Bayes module) to this. Cheers, E.J.
-
Update This is one correct approach I believe: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/bayes-factor-testing-of-equality-and-order-constraints-on-measure We want to implement this in JASP but that project has yet to start. Cheers, E.J.
-
Update This is one correct approach I believe: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/bayes-factor-testing-of-equality-and-order-constraints-on-measure We want to implement this in JASP but that project has yet to start. Cheers, E.J.
-
I forgot, but this is what happened. We had it under development, but then Joris Mulder c.s. beat us to the punch. Let me find the paper...here it is: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/bayes-factor-testing-of-equality-and-order-…
-
Not yet. We had this under development, let me see what's up with that. E.J.
-
Great! Cheers, E.J.
-
I forwarded your message to our meta-analysis expert.
-
You want the p-value for the "Jahr" predictor. I am sure that more interesting things could be done with this interesting dataset though! We will add some time series methods this year, but I believe that time series modeling is a more ins…
-
This is not a problem at all. In fact it is one of the strengths of the Bayesian paradigm. See for instance https://psyarxiv.com/5ntkd
-
Hello DIV, Ah, this is a while ago. Some quick responses here. I will note that it takes some time to get to the bottom of this -- I recall this being a bit of a puzzle even when we were working on it. We checked our implementation with the example …
-
The team has already done the reorganization, and this takes care of the empty space as well. I am sure this is up for continual adjustment. The changes will be included in the next release.
-
I'll pass this on to the team, but note that this is more of a question for GitHub (as this is the most direct path to our software engineers)
-
OK, I took a closer look and I agree the current setup is getting needlessly convoluted. What I proposed to the team is the following: 1. Underneath the variable box, have the "transpose descriptives table" (but not frequency tables and st…
-
We obviously don't want to become Just Another Statistical Program ;-)