EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,481
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
:-) nice
-
It is a good feature request, we will discuss this in the team
-
This is tricky -- there will be a limit to what can be displayed, esp. in an automatic fashion. Are the same numbers reported in tables, so you could ponentially construct your own graph? I will forward this to those who are experts on this analysis…
-
You mean you would like to show the difference in a plot, right? Probably with bars for the conditions, and then horizontal lines for the comparisons? I think this is more of a feature request for our GitHub page! (for details see https://jasp-stats…
-
Ah, OK, I see the help file is not explicit about this. This is relevant for the one-sample t-test I think. I will ask our expert. EJ
-
I think this is more of an issue for our GitHub page (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/), which will bring you in direct contact with the programmers. Also, it may help to turn on "Safe graphics&…
-
Ideally we'd have Bayes factors in addition to credible intervals, as credible intervals are conditional on a model in which the effects are present. You could use BIC as a rough estimate of the BF under relatively wide priors. EJ
-
Yes that makes sense You are right to select "compare to best model", because this yields the easiest interpretation. All models are then compared to the best one, which is "Valence". The reason for the 1.000 is because the Valen…
-
Hi Marie, That is more of an issue for our GitHub page I think (for details see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/). [And of course the easiest fix is to multiply your measurements by some large factor, but it would b…
-
Frequentist stats, because that is what Andy Field does too. The workshop on Thursday and Friday covers Bayes. EJ
-
Isn't this one of the models in the Process module? EJ
-
I'll also attend our expert to this! EJ
-
Dear Willo, "Select custom editor" should only be greyed out when "use default spreadsheet editor" is ticked. So this is a little strange. I recommend you post this issue on our GitHub page (see https://jasp-stats.org/feature-re…
-
Yeah but the complication with brms is that the prior distributions need to be set up with care. I have reminded our expert :-)
-
I've asked our expert for his insights...
-
I've asked our expert! EJ
-
Do you have a screenshot? Also, this might be a feature request or a bug report (in which case it is best to create an issue on our GitHub page, see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/)
-
I'll ask the team
-
I don't know! Will have to ask the expert. Would be best to have a GitHub issue for this.
-
I refer to patc3 here. I do not use these data editing tools a lot myself. Feel free to suggest improvements on our GitHub page... EJ
-
Strange. I will forward this to the experts who created the module. If this is true then it is a bug that should be reported on our GitHub page...
-
Also, information on out GitHub channel is at https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/ and at https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/ EJ
-
Looks like something for a feature request on our GitHub page...
-
Post the issue on our GitHub page (https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/) and include as much detail as you can. You might want to check first that your operating system is up to date, and that you have selected the correct installer …
-
Nice! The reason why I said that it is not fully Bayesian is because in a two step analysis, the uncertainty in the first step (the residuals) is unaccounted for.
-
Thanks!
-
@vinschger no that looks like a bug. Please report the rotated densities on our GitHub page (see https://jasp-stats.org/feature-requests-bug-reports/)
-
Did you notice the graph editor? For most graphs, "edit image" (activated upon clicking the small black triangle on top of each figure) allows you to define the ranges and ticks on the axes. Cheers, EJ
-
Update: with my own JASP 0.19.3 my outliers are labelled. We never got a complaint about outliers not being labeled, so I think something else must be going on. Just to confirm: you do see black dots that fall above or below of the whiskers? EJ
-
Dear MeieJ, It would help if you show a screenshot, or (even better) if you can include the data. I suspect this issue can be solved very quickly. If not, I advise you to post the issue on our GitHub page, which will bring you in direct contact with…