EJ
About
- Username
- EJ
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,557
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Administrator, Moderator
Comments
-
Hi Gary, Here's a recent post on the topic: https://jasp-stats.org/2020/03/12/mediation-and-moderation-analysis-in-jasp/ Cheers, EJ
-
Yes, the Bayesian ANOVA can also be applied to unbalanced designs, so this should not be a problem. Cheers, EJ
-
Hi Mateus, Opinions differ. You could show them and indicate explicitly that these obtain under the assumption that there is an effect (an assumption that the data undercut). EJ
-
Ah, I see the problem. You used the first row for headings, but JASP expects data there. So instead of "V2", we want "Age", and the column needs to start with "14" E.J.
-
You need "rows fixed" then (as the rows denote the conditions) EJ
-
Suppose you want to compare two proportions. Proportion 1: 0 successes out of 5 trials Proportion 2: 1 success out of 6 trials So: Successes Failures Condition 1 0 5…
-
Update: it will be in the next release :-) E.J.
-
Yes, it would be better to be able to change it. Can you make a GitHub request, perhaps? (see https://jasp-stats.org/2018/03/29/request-feature-report-bug-jasp/) E.J.
-
Strange! Can you send the entire JASP file so I can see what's going on? Better still, can you submit this as a GitHub issue so the programming team can have a go? Cheers, E.J.
-
I'll ask our expert! Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Miriam, I'll ask our expert. Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Mateus, Yes, good evidence for the null model and against the "cluster" factor E.J.
-
I'll ask our expert...maybe this was done in the developers version of JASP. E.J.
-
I don't think this is a problem. The default priors are mostly based on general desiderata, "objective-Bayes" style. For the correlation, even if the alternative hypothesis is specified to predict correlations closer to zero (this can be d…
-
Thanks. I'll ask our ANOVA expert. E.J.
-
My thoughts have not changed but also/mainly because I have not given it much thought. I will revisit this when we implement this in JASP! On our to-do list... Cheers, E.J.
-
Dear AnaOnar, There is not. JASP respects the principle of marginality, which means that if you have an interaction, the constituent main effects are in there as well. Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi Massimo, It seem to me that you have to start by computing Sensibility and Specificity for each study separately. But you need se's for this as well. I am not sure how a classical analysis deals with this (bootstrap?). I will ask our expert. Chee…
-
Hi Anna, Yes, I'm keen on that too :-) Lots of stuff happening with JASP so we have to prioritize. It will happen though. At least logistic regression is next on our list. E.J.
-
Hmmm I see our expert has not responded yet...I'll prompt him :-)
-
Hi apangallo, Descriptives is able to return the standard error, so that should help. Of course if you do a t-test you'll get the t-value as well... E.J.
-
Sorry about the delay! The "e" is scientific notation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation, see E-notation) for large numbers. So 2.12e+11 means 2.12 and then move the period 11 positions to the right, so it is 212000000000. …
-
Hi eniseg2, I am not sure about the discrepancy -- when the prior inclusion plot suggests a small increase in probability, the inclusion BF suggests weak evidence in favor of adding that component. There is nothing special about a BF value of 3. If …
-
Hi JC, Sorry about the tardy response, this one slipped through. First of all, there is no way to compare BFs directly. Instead, you need a BF for the difference. So what you'd need to do is combine the two conditions into one analysis file, and tes…
-
If JASP recognizes the variable as nominal, it suggests some entries (at least one) has a character string. This could be an undefined "not a number" indicator, or perhaps the Excel version you used denotes fractions with a comma: that is,…
-
I'll forward this to Richard
-
Hi roundcircle, Well, you have B01 (from R or JASP), and you can easily compute the numerator, so that then determines the denominator. However, (I have not checked this) I'd be surprised if that equation shows the two marginal likelihoods -- I susp…
-
Hi MSB, "r" is the sample value. The underlying model parameter is "rho". Cheers, E.J.
-
Hi AnaOnar, Nothing is wrong. This procedure uses numerical integration and therefore the results will be slightly different each time. For enhanced reproducibility, the next version will include a random seed that you can set in order to reproduce …
-
Hi WWU, Ah, I see. Strange. Well we do run SEM to do the CFA but I'll pass this on to Erik-Jan (with a k) who might have bright ideas. Cheers, EJ